Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 104 (2026)

Affiliated interests

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1975, c. 400 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 426, §1 (RPR). PL 1981, c. 672, §§1-6 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 604 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 481, §C10 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 604, §1 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 629, §5 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 141, §A5 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1972–1987 · leading case: Maine Pub. Serv. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 524 A.2d 1222 (Me. 1987).
Maine Pub. Serv. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 524 A.2d 1222 (Me. 1987). · cites it 2× “We conclude that the Commission exceeded its statutory authority in ordering MPS to pursue a merger with CMP. The entry is: The Commission Order dated May 15, 1986 is reversed.”
Berry v. Maine Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 394 A.2d 790 (Me. 1978). “Appellant’s personal use of an Augusta apartment rented by two of the companies, of which he is President, for which reimbursement by him was frequently in arrears, was found to be an extension of credit in violation of 35 M.R.S.A. § 104. 3 This section required contracts or…”
Bangor & Aroostook R.R. v. Bangor Punta Operations, Inc., 353 F. Supp. 724 (D. Me. 1972). “Counts I and II are brought, respectively, under the common law of Maine (Count I) and Section 104 of the Maine Public Utilities Act (35 M.R.S.A. § 104) (Count II). They charge that BAC, and later BPO, improperly charged BAR for nominal legal, accounting, printing and other…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.