Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 131 (2026)

Fuel adjustment clause

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(REPEALED)

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1975, c. 489, §1 (NEW). PL 1977, c. 475 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 689, §1 (RPR). PL 1979, c. 643, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 295, §1 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 322, §1 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 141, §A5 (RP).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1980–1998 · leading case: Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 458 A.2d 739 (Me. 1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 458 A.2d 739 (Me. 1983). · cites it 9× “In 1978, the Maine Legislature enacted 35 M.R.S.A. § 131, which governs fuel adjustment for utilities.”

Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 414 A.2d 1217 (Me. 1980). · cites it 3× “At the time Maine Yankee was shut down the utilities’ schedules of permanent rates included a “fuel adjustment” provision, so-called, pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 131, 3 and approved by the Commission.”

Maine Pub. Advocate v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 476 A.2d 178 (Me. 1984). · cites it 4× “§ 303 (1978), the Public Advocate argues the PUC’s subsequent decision on remand incorrectly interpreted both the decision of this court and the provisions of 35 M.R.S.A. § 131, the fuel cost adjustment statute.”

Pub. Advocate v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 1998 ME 218 (Me. 1998). · cites it 2× “1983) (The "[l]egislature did not intend to include sales-related shares within the scope of the fuel cost adjustment" (construing former 35 M.R.S.A. § 131)); see also Maine Pub. Advocate, 476 A.”

First Hartford Corp. v. Cent. Maine Power Co., 425 A.2d 174 (Me. 1981). · cites it 2× “1975 enacted 35 M.R.S.A. § 131, section 1 of which provided as follows: 1.”

Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 433 A.2d 331 (Me. 1981). “8 *347 Third, and finally, the record leaves us uncertain whether the Company is seeking to receive rate reimbursement of fuel costs that the legislature has separately provided for under the fuel adjustment provision, 35 M.R.S.A. § 131 (Supp.1980-81). See Central Maine Power…”

State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Thornburg, 353 S.E.2d 413 (N.C. Ct. App. 1987). “111-2/3, § 9-220 (Smith-Hurd 1986); Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 35, § 131 (6) (1986); Md.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 131(1) — 1 case

Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 414 A.2d 1217 (Me. 1980). “At the time Maine Yankee was shut down the utilities’ schedules of permanent rates included a “fuel adjustment” provision, so-called, pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 131, 3 and approved by the Commission.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 131(2) — 2 cases

Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 458 A.2d 739 (Me. 1983). “In 1978, the Maine Legislature enacted 35 M.R.S.A. § 131, which governs fuel adjustment for utilities.”

Maine Pub. Advocate v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 476 A.2d 178 (Me. 1984). “§ 303 (1978), the Public Advocate argues the PUC’s subsequent decision on remand incorrectly interpreted both the decision of this court and the provisions of 35 M.R.S.A. § 131, the fuel cost adjustment statute.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 131(4) — 2 cases

Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 458 A.2d 739 (Me. 1983). “In 1978, the Maine Legislature enacted 35 M.R.S.A. § 131, which governs fuel adjustment for utilities.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 131(6) — 1 case

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.