Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 295 (2026)

Conformity to decision; copies

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1987, c. 141, §A5 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1977–1981 · leading case: Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Maine Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 436 A.2d 880 (Me. 1981).
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Maine Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 436 A.2d 880 (Me. 1981). · cites it 3× “On August 3, 1981, the PUC granted these motions on the ground that its § 69 substitute rate order of October 31, 1980, brought into effect the one year bar created by 35 M.R.S.A. § 295 2 and prevented CMP from filing proposed rates under § 64 prior to the expiration of one year…”
Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 381 A.2d 1080 (Me. 1977). “This two-day period was necessary so that the Commission could determine that the substituted rate schedule conformed to its March 19 order, 35 M.R.S.A. § 295, 49 and that the new schedule would yield revenues found by the Commission in its prior order to be just and reasonable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.