Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 35
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 66 (2026)

Adherence to rate schedules; change in form of schedules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1981, c. 135 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 469, §13 (RPR). PL 1981, c. 666 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 481, §C8 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 141, §A5 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1976–1980 · leading case: Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 414 A.2d 1217 (Me. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 414 A.2d 1217 (Me. 1980). · cites it 2× “” 35 M.R.S.A. § 66 (1978). To aid the Commission in achieving these paramount objectives, the legislature has made available to the Commission various specific mechanisms, among which is the power to investigate the management practices of a utility, see 35 M.”
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 362 A.2d 741 (Me. 1976). “The argument seems to derive from 35 M.R.S.A. § 66, which states: “It shall be unlawful for any public utility to charge, demand, collect or receive a greater or less compensation, than is specified in such printed schedules, .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.