Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 38
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 38, § 363 (2026)

Standards of classification of fresh waters

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1967, c. 475, §4 (RPR). PL 1969, c. 431, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 461, §2 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 618, §12 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 450, §§5,6 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 788, §207 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 373, §§1-5 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 529 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 698, §4 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1967–1977 · leading case: Ethyl Corp. v. Adams, 375 A.2d 1065 (Me. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ethyl Corp. v. Adams, 375 A.2d 1065 (Me. 1977). · cites it 2× “Swain Brook is classified as a class "C" water as defined in 38 M.R.S.A. § 363, which provides that "There shall be no discharge to these waters which will cause the hydrogen-ion concentration, or `pH' of these waters to fall outside of the 6.”
State of Water Improvement Comm'n v. Hastings, 231 A.2d 436 (Me. 1967). “The Justice below found that the defendants were in violation of 38 M.R.S.A. § 363, and enjoined the further discharge of untreated sewage into the brook by the defendants.”
State of Water Improvement Comm'n v. Morrill, 231 A.2d 437 (Me. 1967). · cites it 2× “He dismissed defendant’s motion and in his judgment found that the defendant had violated the requirements of 38 M.R.S.A. § 363, and had not' complied with the court’s order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.