Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 39
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 185 (2026)

Aggravation of occupational disease

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1991, c. 885, §A7 (RP). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1980–1992 · leading case: Norton v. C.P. Blouin, Inc., 511 A.2d 1056 (Me. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Norton v. C.P. Blouin, Inc., 511 A.2d 1056 (Me. 1986). “The single commissioner’s conclusion that section 194-B affects only procedural changes in the law cannot be sustained.”
McKenzie v. C. F. Hathaway Co., 415 A.2d 252 (Me. 1980). “Since the Commissioner found that petitioner’s disabling respiratory condition was neither caused nor aggravated by exposure to dust at the Hathaway plant, we need not decide the present meaning of 39 M.R.S.A. § 185. We simply note that § 185 was enacted at a time when…”
Brawn v. St. Regis Paper Co., 430 A.2d 843 (Me. 1981). “Having found no occupational disease, the Commission was also correct in concluding that it had no occasion for applying 39 M.R.S.A. § 185, which provides for apportionment between an occupational disease and other, noncompensable, causes of death or incapacity.”
Manzo v. Great N. Paper Co., 615 A.2d 605 (Me. 1992). “, 39 M.R.S.A. §§ 185, 187, 189, 193, & 194-B(4).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.