Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 39
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 22 (2026)

Approval of insurance policies and rates by the Superintendent of Insurance

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1973, c. 585, §12 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 696, §397 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 211 (RPR). PL 1981, c. 471, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 509, §1 (RP). PL 1983, c. 551, §§3,4 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 816, §B22 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1991 · leading case: Nat'l Council on Comp. Ins. v. Superintendent of Ins., 481 A.2d 775 (Me. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat'l Council on Comp. Ins. v. Superintendent of Ins., 481 A.2d 775 (Me. 1984). · cites it 2× “39 M.R.S.A. § 22(3) (Supp.1983). The Superintendent also concluded that because these two sections were not satisfied, NCCI failed to establish that the proposed rates were correct and proper and that they met the requirements of Title 24-A, Chapters 23 and 25.”
MAINE AFL-CIO v. Superintendent of Ins., 595 A.2d 424 (Me. 1991). “39 M.R.S.A. § 22(6), repealed by P.L.1983, ch.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 22(3) — 1 case
Nat'l Council on Comp. Ins. v. Superintendent of Ins., 481 A.2d 775 (Me. 1984). “39 M.R.S.A. § 22(3) (Supp.1983). The Superintendent also concluded that because these two sections were not satisfied, NCCI failed to establish that the proposed rates were correct and proper and that they met the requirements of Title 24-A, Chapters 23 and 25.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 22(6) — 2 cases
Nat'l Council on Comp. Ins. v. Superintendent of Ins., 481 A.2d 775 (Me. 1984). “39 M.R.S.A. § 22(3) (Supp.1983). The Superintendent also concluded that because these two sections were not satisfied, NCCI failed to establish that the proposed rates were correct and proper and that they met the requirements of Title 24-A, Chapters 23 and 25.”
MAINE AFL-CIO v. Superintendent of Ins., 595 A.2d 424 (Me. 1991). “39 M.R.S.A. § 22(6), repealed by P.L.1983, ch.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.