Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39-A, § 303 (2026)

Reports to board

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
When any employee has reported to an employer under this Act any injury arising out of and in the course of the employee's employment that has caused the employee to lose a day's work, or when the employer has knowledge of any such injury, the employer shall report the injury to the board within 7 days after the employer receives notice or has knowledge of the injury. The employer shall also report the average weekly wages or earnings of the employee, as defined in section 102, subsection 4, together with any other information required by the board, within 30 days after the employer receives notice or has knowledge of a claim for compensation under section 212, 213 or 215, unless a wage statement has previously been filed with the board. The wage statement must report the earnings or wages of the employee on a weekly basis, unless the employee is paid on other than a weekly basis, in which case the employer may report the earnings or wages in the same manner as earnings or wages are paid. A copy of the wage information must be mailed to the employee. The employer shall report when the injured employee resumes the employee's employment and the amount of the employee's wages or earnings at that time. The employer shall complete a first report of injury form for any injury that has required the services of a health care provider within 7 days after the employer receives notice or has knowledge of the injury. The employer shall provide a copy of the form to the injured employee and retain a copy for the employer's records but is not obligated to submit the form to the board unless the injury later causes the employee to lose a day's work. The employer is also required to submit the form to the board if the board has finally adopted a major substantive rule pursuant to Title 5, chapter 375, subchapter 2‑A to require the form to be filed electronically.   [PL 2023, c. 205, §6 (AMD).]
If an employee has had an incapacity beyond the 14-day period established in section 204 and subsequently returns to work and attends medical appointments related to the injury, the employer is not required to report the lost time for such appointments to the board if the employee did not lose wages for attending such appointments.   [PL 2015, c. 297, §9 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1991, c. 885, §A8 (NEW). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF). PL 1999, c. 354, §5 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 471, §1 (AMD). PL 2013, c. 63, §8 (AMD). PL 2015, c. 297, §9 (AMD). PL 2023, c. 205, §6 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2025 · leading case: Graves v. Brockway-Smith Co., 55 A.3d 456 (Me. 2012).
Graves v. Brockway-Smith Co., 55 A.3d 456 (Me. 2012). · cites it 4× “1 We are asked to decide whether that six-year period was tolled until the employer filed a first report of injury with the Workers’ Compensation Board, even though at the time of the injury the employer was not required to file a first report pursuant to 39-A M.R.S. § 303…”
Joyce v. S.D. Warren Co., 759 A.2d 712 (Me. 2000). “Although section 106 was repealed effective January 1, 1993, the new counterpart provision, 39-A M.R.S.A. § 303 (Pamph.1999), contains a virtually identical first report of injury requirement.”
Pearson v. Freeport Sch. Dep't, 900 A.2d 728 (Me. 2006). “See 39-A M.R.S. § 303 (2005); Me. W.G.B. Rule, ch.”
Wilson v. Bath Iron Works, 942 A.2d 1237 (Me. 2008). · cites it 3× “BIW filed its first report of injury on May 13, 2004, pursuant to 39-A M.R.S. § 303 (2007). 1 The hearing officer determined that BIW properly filed the first report of injury in response to the petition for award.”
Katherine Stovall v. New England Tel. Co., 2025 ME 47 (Me. 2025). “1996) (memorandum of payment and fourteen-day requirement); 39-A M.R.S.A. § 303 (Supp. 1996) (first report of injury); 39-A M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.