Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 39-A
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39-A, § 325 (2026)

Costs; attorney's fees allowable

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.  Costs and attorney's fees.  Except as otherwise provided by law, by the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure or by rule of court, each party is responsible for the payment of the party's own costs and attorney's fees. In the event of a disagreement as to those costs or fees, an interested party may apply to the board for a hearing.  
[PL 1991, c. 885, Pt. A, §8 (NEW); PL 1991, c. 885, Pt. A, §§9-11 (AFF).]
2.  Restriction on attorney's fees.  An attorney representing an employee in a proceeding under this Act may receive a fee from that client for an activity pursuant to the Act only as provided in this section. The fees and payment of fees to all attorneys for services provided to employees under this Act are subject to the approval of the board. The board may approve the payment of attorney's fees by the employee for services provided to the employee pursuant to this Act. Any attorney who violates this section must forfeit any fee in the case and is liable in a court suit to pay damages to the client equal to 2 times the fee charged to that client.  
[PL 1991, c. 885, Pt. A, §8 (NEW); PL 1991, c. 885, Pt. A, §§9-11 (AFF).]
3.  Rules.  The board shall adopt rules to prescribe maximum attorney's fees and the manner in which the amount is determined and paid by the employee. The maximum attorney's fees prescribed by the board in a case tried to completion may not exceed 30% of the benefits accrued, after deducting reasonable expenses incurred on behalf of the employee, or be based on a weekly benefit amount after coordination that is higher than 2/3 of the state average weekly wage at the time of injury. The board may by rule allow attorney's fees to be increased above or decreased below the amount specified in the rule when in the discretion of the board that action is determined to be appropriate.  
[PL 1991, c. 885, Pt. A, §8 (NEW); PL 1991, c. 885, Pt. A, §§9-11 (AFF).]
4.  Attorney's fees for lump-sum settlements.  Attorney's fees for lump-sum settlements pursuant to section 352 must be determined as follows:  
A. Before computing the fee, reasonable expenses incurred on the employee's behalf must be deducted from the total settlement, including:  
(1) Medical examination fee and witness fee;  
(2) Any other medical witness fee, including cost of subpoena;  
(3) Cost of court reporter service; and  
(4) Appeal costs; and   [PL 1991, c. 885, Pt. A, §8 (NEW); PL 1991, c. 885, Pt. A, §§9-11 (AFF).]
B. The computation of the fee, based on the amount resulting after deductions according to paragraph A, may not exceed:  
(1) Ten percent of the first $50,000 of the settlement;  
(2) Nine percent of the first $10,000 over $50,000 of the settlement;  
(3) Eight percent of the next $10,000 over $50,000 of the settlement;  
(4) Seven percent of the next $10,000 over $50,000 of the settlement;  
(5) Six percent of the next $10,000 over $50,000 of the settlement; and  
(6) Five percent of any amount over $90,000 of the settlement.   [PL 1991, c. 885, Pt. A, §8 (NEW); PL 1991, c. 885, Pt. A, §§9-11 (AFF).]
[PL 1991, c. 885, Pt. A, §8 (NEW); PL 1991, c. 885, Pt. A, §§9-11 (AFF).]
5.  Attorney's fees in cases in which the injury occurred prior to January 1, 1993.  In cases in which the injury to the employee occurred prior to January 1, 1993, the amount of the attorney's fees is determined by the law in effect at the date of the injury and is payable by the employer. If the employee attended a mediation pursuant to section 313 after January 1, 1993 and was represented by an attorney, the attorney's fees may include compensation from the date of the mediation session.  
[PL 1991, c. 885, Pt. A, §8 (NEW); PL 1991, c. 885, Pt. A, §§9-11 (AFF).]
6.  Attorney's fees for lump-sum settlement in cases in which the injury occurred on or after January 1, 2020.  In cases in which the injury to the employee occurred on or after January 1, 2020, attorney's fees for lump-sum settlements must be determined as follows.  
A. Before computing the fee, reasonable expenses incurred on the employee's behalf must be deducted from the total settlement, including:  
(1) Medical examination fee and witness fee;  
(2) Any other medical witness fee, including cost of subpoena;  
(3) Cost of court reporter service; and  
(4) Appeal costs.   [PL 2019, c. 344, §14 (NEW).]
B. The computation of the fee, based on the amount resulting after deductions according to paragraph A, may not exceed 10%.   [PL 2019, c. 344, §14 (NEW).]
C. If a lump‑sum settlement includes any amount that is allocated for past due benefits, the administrative law judge shall review the allocation to make sure that it is not for an amount that is greater than what the employee is claiming.   [PL 2019, c. 344, §14 (NEW).]
[PL 2019, c. 344, §14 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1991, c. 885, §A8 (NEW). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF). PL 2019, c. 344, §14 (AMD).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case: Ray v. Carland Constr., Inc., 1997 ME 206 (Me. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ray v. Carland Constr., Inc., 1997 ME 206 (Me. 1997). · cites it 2× “§ 221, employer-paid attorney fees, 39-A M.R.S.A. § 325, and could conceivably be subject to a shorter statute of limitations, 39-A M.”
Nilsen v. York Cnty., 400 F. Supp. 2d 266 (D. Me. 2005). “39-A M.R.S.A. § 325(4)(B) (2001) (if case tried to completion, fees may not exceed 30% of benefits accrued; for lump-sum settlements post-expenses, fees restricted to 10% of first $50,000, 9% through 6% of the next increments of $10,000, and 5% of any amount over $90,000).”
DeRice v. S.D. Warren Co., 1997 ME 84 (Me. 1997). · cites it 3× “39-A M.R.SA § 325(1) (Supp.1996). With respect to injuries occurring before that date, subsection 325(5) provides as follows: In cases in which the injury to the employee occurred prior to January 1, 1993, the amount of the attorney’s fees is determined by the law in effect at…”
Doucette v. Pathways, Inc., 759 A.2d 718 (Me. 2000). · cites it 5× “The employee’s right to attorney’s fees is solely governed by 39-A M.R.S.A. § 325 (Pamph.1999). [¶ 10] 39-A M.”
Brown v. Sappi Fine Paper, 853 A.2d 779 (Me. 2004). · cites it 3× “885, §§ A-7, A-8 (codified as 39-A M.R.S.A. § 325 (2001)). The 1989 statute authorizes the hearing officer to “assess the employer costs of a reasonable attorney’s fee,” in cases in which the employee “prevails in any proceeding involving a controversy under this Act.”
Collora v. Leahy (In Re Leahy), 170 B.R. 10 (Bankr. D. Me. 1994). “§ 110(2) (repealed by 39-A M.R.S.A. § 325, eff. January 1, 1993) provided: "Injuries on or after the effective date of the section.”
Campbell v. Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 59, 658 A.2d 1094 (Me. 1995). “Former section 110 has been repealed and replaced by 39-A M.R.S.A. § 325 (Supp.1994-95). Maine Workers’ Compensation Act of 1992, P.”
Kinney v. Great N. Paper, Inc., 679 A.2d 517 (Me. 1996). “The employees prevailed in separate proceedings before the Board and filed motions for attorney fees pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 325(5). 1 The Board granted the motions *518 and assessed interest pursuant to former 39 M.”
Parker v. Walter F. Newell Constr., 711 A.2d 151 (Me. 1998). · cites it 3× “The Board concluded that, although the employer’s attorney did not attend the mediation, the employer had been represented by counsel prior to the mediation, and therefore the employee was entitled to employer-paid attorney fees for pre-medi-ation services pursuant to 39-A…”
Webster v. Bath Iron Works, 718 A.2d 574 (Me. 1998). · cites it 3× “The applicable section of the Maine law is 39-A M.R.S.A. § 325. The fee reported by Mr.”
Zakaria Allaf v. Shoreline Holdings Five, LLC, 2025 ME 95 (Me. 2025). “§ 1406(5) (2025); 39-A M.R.S. § 325(1) (2025). [¶20] This understanding of attorney fees as a type of recoverable litigation cost is also reflected in the text of the wrongful-retention statute.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39-A, § 325(1) — 3 cases
DeRice v. S.D. Warren Co., 1997 ME 84 (Me. 1997). “39-A M.R.SA § 325(1) (Supp.1996). With respect to injuries occurring before that date, subsection 325(5) provides as follows: In cases in which the injury to the employee occurred prior to January 1, 1993, the amount of the attorney’s fees is determined by the law in effect at…”
Doucette v. Pathways, Inc., 759 A.2d 718 (Me. 2000). “The employee’s right to attorney’s fees is solely governed by 39-A M.R.S.A. § 325 (Pamph.1999). [¶ 10] 39-A M.”
Zakaria Allaf v. Shoreline Holdings Five, LLC, 2025 ME 95 (Me. 2025). “§ 1406(5) (2025); 39-A M.R.S. § 325(1) (2025). [¶20] This understanding of attorney fees as a type of recoverable litigation cost is also reflected in the text of the wrongful-retention statute.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39-A, § 325(3) — 1 case
Doucette v. Pathways, Inc., 759 A.2d 718 (Me. 2000). “The employee’s right to attorney’s fees is solely governed by 39-A M.R.S.A. § 325 (Pamph.1999). [¶ 10] 39-A M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39-A, § 325(4)(B) — 2 cases
Nilsen v. York Cnty., 400 F. Supp. 2d 266 (D. Me. 2005). “39-A M.R.S.A. § 325(4)(B) (2001) (if case tried to completion, fees may not exceed 30% of benefits accrued; for lump-sum settlements post-expenses, fees restricted to 10% of first $50,000, 9% through 6% of the next increments of $10,000, and 5% of any amount over $90,000).”
Doucette v. Pathways, Inc., 759 A.2d 718 (Me. 2000). “The employee’s right to attorney’s fees is solely governed by 39-A M.R.S.A. § 325 (Pamph.1999). [¶ 10] 39-A M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39-A, § 325(5) — 5 cases
DeRice v. S.D. Warren Co., 1997 ME 84 (Me. 1997). “39-A M.R.SA § 325(1) (Supp.1996). With respect to injuries occurring before that date, subsection 325(5) provides as follows: In cases in which the injury to the employee occurred prior to January 1, 1993, the amount of the attorney’s fees is determined by the law in effect at…”
Brown v. Sappi Fine Paper, 853 A.2d 779 (Me. 2004). “885, §§ A-7, A-8 (codified as 39-A M.R.S.A. § 325 (2001)). The 1989 statute authorizes the hearing officer to “assess the employer costs of a reasonable attorney’s fee,” in cases in which the employee “prevails in any proceeding involving a controversy under this Act.”
Kinney v. Great N. Paper, Inc., 679 A.2d 517 (Me. 1996). “The employees prevailed in separate proceedings before the Board and filed motions for attorney fees pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 325(5). 1 The Board granted the motions *518 and assessed interest pursuant to former 39 M.”
Parker v. Walter F. Newell Constr., 711 A.2d 151 (Me. 1998). “The Board concluded that, although the employer’s attorney did not attend the mediation, the employer had been represented by counsel prior to the mediation, and therefore the employee was entitled to employer-paid attorney fees for pre-medi-ation services pursuant to 39-A…”
Webster v. Bath Iron Works, 718 A.2d 574 (Me. 1998). “The applicable section of the Maine law is 39-A M.R.S.A. § 325. The fee reported by Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.