Go Syfert

Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 1121 (2026)

Service retirement

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(REPEALED)

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1965, c. 288, §2 (AMD). PL 1965, c. 414 (AMD). PL 1965, c. 439, §§1,2,4 (AMD). PL 1965, c. 445, §§3,4 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 143, §2 (AMD). P&SL 1967, c. 154, §D (AMD). PL 1967, c. 467, §1 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 544, §§12,13 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 415, §§5,6 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 427 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 574, §1 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 590, §§4-A (AMD). PL 1971, c. 154, §§2,3 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 167, §§1,2 (AMD). P&SL 1971, c. 179, §§E1,E2 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 482, §2 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 513, §2 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 517 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 520 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 533 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 622, §§11-13,13-A (AMD). PL 1973, c. 191 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 412, §§3,4 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 460, §18 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 513, §22 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 542, §§4-9 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 606 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 619 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 788, §§17-19 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 210 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 497, §3 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 622, §§40-53 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 742, §2 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 766, §4 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 770, §§23,24 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 771, §§61-64 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 78, §15 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 564, §32 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 580, §§4-11 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 661, §2 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 699, §§1-4 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 127, §35 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 624, §§1-3 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 146 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 480, §§A5,A6 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 751, §§5-12 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 38, §1 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 365, §8 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 507, §§4,5 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 801, §§2,7 (RP).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1986–2009 · leading case: Mcphee v. Maine State Ret. Sys., 2009 ME 100 (Me. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Mcphee v. Maine State Ret. Sys., 2009 ME 100 (Me. 2009). · cites it 2× “*1260 See 5 M.R.S.A. § 1121(1)(D) (Supp.1984) currently codified, with subsequent amendments, at 5 M.”

Robinson v. Bd. of Trs. of the Maine State Ret. Sys., 523 A.2d 1376 (Me. 1987). · cites it 2× “State police officers may retire with full benefits upon completing 20 years of creditable service pursuant to 5 M.R.S.A. § 1121(1)(C). [2] Eligibility for retirement from the state police is based solely on employment with that entity.”

Davey v. Lincoln Cnty., 505 A.2d 818 (Me. 1986). · cites it 6× “Nonetheless, his widow applied to the State Retirement System for pension benefits pursuant to 5 M.R.S.A. § 1121(7) (1979) (hereinafter referred to as the “State Retirement Provision”).”

State v. Maine State Employees Ass'n, 538 A.2d 755 (Me. 1988). · cites it 2× “The first two proposals sought to amend retirement plans for two groups of employees by creating eligibility for retirement benefits after twenty (20) years of State service, instead of after twenty-five (25) years as then required by 5 M.R.S.A. § 1121 (Supp. 1985). 1 The' third…”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 1121(1)(C) — 1 case

Robinson v. Bd. of Trs. of the Maine State Ret. Sys., 523 A.2d 1376 (Me. 1987). “State police officers may retire with full benefits upon completing 20 years of creditable service pursuant to 5 M.R.S.A. § 1121(1)(C). [2] Eligibility for retirement from the state police is based solely on employment with that entity.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 1121(1)(D) — 1 case

Mcphee v. Maine State Ret. Sys., 2009 ME 100 (Me. 2009). “*1260 See 5 M.R.S.A. § 1121(1)(D) (Supp.1984) currently codified, with subsequent amendments, at 5 M.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 1121(7) — 1 case

Davey v. Lincoln Cnty., 505 A.2d 818 (Me. 1986). “Nonetheless, his widow applied to the State Retirement System for pension benefits pursuant to 5 M.R.S.A. § 1121(7) (1979) (hereinafter referred to as the “State Retirement Provision”).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.