Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 8003 (2026)

Inconsistent provisions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except where expressly authorized by statute, any statutory provision now existing or hereafter adopted which is inconsistent with the express provisions of the Maine Administrative Procedure Act shall yield and the applicable provisions of this Act shall govern in its stead. [PL 1977, c. 694, §33 (NEW).]

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1977, c. 568, §1 (NEW). PL 1977, c. 694, §33 (NEW). PL 1977, c. 696, §48 (RAL).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1982–1994 · leading case: Superintendent of Ins. v. Attorney Gen., 558 A.2d 1197 (Me. 1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Superintendent of Ins. v. Attorney Gen., 558 A.2d 1197 (Me. 1989). “5 M.R.S.A. § 8003 (1979). Our comparison of the review provisions of the A.”

Fernald v. Maine State Parole Bd., 447 A.2d 1236 (Me. 1982). “” 5 M.R.S.A. § 8003 (1979) provides that inconsistent statutory provisions shall yield to the Administrative Procedure Act “[ejxcept where expressly authorized by statute.”

Gulf Island Pond Oxygenation Proj. P'ship v. Bd. of Env't Prot., 644 A.2d 1055 (Me. 1994). “5 M.R.S.A. § 8003 (1989). Moreover, the Board routinely reviews the Commissioner’s denial of tax exemption certifications.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.