Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 9-B, § 256 (2026)

Judicial review of superintendent's action

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person or organization affected adversely by a rule, regulation, amendment, order or decision on an application promulgated by the superintendent, or affected adversely by the denial of a request for a hearing, may appeal from that action. Judicial review of any final action of the superintendent shall be in accordance with the Maine Administrative Procedure Act, Title 5, chapter 375, subchapter VII. [PL 1977, c. 694, §165 (RPR).]

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1975, c. 500, §1 (NEW). PL 1977, c. 694, §165 (RPR).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1984–1992 · leading case: Lovell v. One Bancorp, 614 A.2d 56 (Me. 1992).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Lovell v. One Bancorp, 614 A.2d 56 (Me. 1992). · cites it 3× “See 9-B M.R.S.A. § 256 (1980); 5 M.R.S.A. §§ 11001-11002 (1989); M.”

Ricci v. Superintendent, Bureau of Banking, 485 A.2d 645 (Me. 1984). “The Maine Banking Code, in 9-B M.R.S.A. § 256 (1980), provides that a person “affected adversely” by a decision of the Superintendent may appeal from that action to the courts.”

Lovell v. One Bancorp, 690 F. Supp. 1090 (D. Me. 1988). “§ 11001 (made applicable by 9-B M.R.S.A. § 256). The Superior Court is authorized to reverse or modify the Superintendent’s approval if that approval violates constitutional or statutory provisions, exceeds the Superintendent’s statutory authority, is based upon unlawful…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.