Massachusetts General Laws
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 12, § 11I (2026)
Violations of constitutional rights; civil actions by aggrieved persons; costs and fees
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MAmalegislature.gov (official)
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 11I. Any person whose exercise or enjoyment of rights secured by the constitution or laws of the United States, or of rights secured by the constitution or laws of the commonwealth, has been interfered with, or attempted to be interfered with, as described in section 11H, may institute and prosecute in his own name and on his own behalf a civil action for injunctive and other appropriate equitable relief as provided for in said section, including the award of compensatory money damages. Any aggrieved person or persons who prevail in an action authorized by this section shall be entitled to an award of the costs of the litigation and reasonable attorneys' fees in an amount to be fixed by the court.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 193
cases (68 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: O'connell v. Chasdi, 511 N.E.2d 349 (Mass. 1987).
O'connell v. Chasdi, 511 N.E.2d 349 (Mass. 1987). “After the jury returned verdicts for the plaintiff on her claims against Chasdi for assault and battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress, the judge granted Chasdi's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdicts on the ground that those claims were barred by…”
Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc., 502 N.E.2d 1375 (Mass. 1987). “I do not agree that G.L.c. 12, § 11I, imposes liability on a defendant whose intentional conduct unintentionally causes interference with a plaintiff's secured right.”
Batchelder v. Allied Stores Corp., 473 N.E.2d 1128 (Mass. 1985). “After entry of judgment, the plaintiff moved for an award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to G. L. c. 12, § 11I. 2 A Superior Court judge denied this motion, stating that our holding only declared Batchelder’s rights under art.”
Madsen v. Erwin, 481 N.E.2d 1160 (Mass. 1985). “We reverse the judge's denial of the defendants' motion for summary judgment with respect to the plaintiff's claims against the defendants under the Federal and State Constitutions, under G.L.c. 12, § 11I, her claim for breach of contract and for wrongful discharge.”
Bell v. Mazza, 474 N.E.2d 1111 (Mass. 1985). “Bell, appeal from an order of a Superior Court judge which dismissed their complaint for failure to state a claim under G. L. c. 12, § 11I, and 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3) (1982).”
Batchelder v. Allied Stores Int'l, Inc., 445 N.E.2d 590 (Mass. 1983). “9 and 16 of the Declaration of Rights of the Constitution of the Commonwealth, and under G.L.c. 12, § 11I, to solicit signatures in support of ballot access in the mall, or common area, of the North Shore Shopping Center.”
Breault v. Chairman of Bd, Fire Commr. of Springfield, 513 N.E.2d 1277 (Mass. 1987). “12, § 11H, incorporated by reference in G.L.c. 12, § 11I, the Act operates almost entirely within the realm of "intentional" behavior.”
Glovsky v. Roche Bros. Supermarkets, Inc., 17 N.E.3d 1026 (Mass. 2014). “He requested relief under the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act, G. L. c. 12, § 11I (act), for a violation of his rights "by threats, intimidation or coercion.”
Mancuso v. Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Ass'n, 453 Mass. 116 (Mass. 2009). “” G. L. c. 12, § 11I, citing G. L. c. 12, § 11H.”
Spence v. Boston Edison Co., 459 N.E.2d 80 (Mass. 1983). “V 1981) and G. L. c. 12, § 11I, the Federal and State Civil Rights Acts, though not initially addressed by the parties, is a crucial one.”
Deas v. Dempsey, 530 N.E.2d 1239 (Mass. 1988). “This resulted in dismissal of the plaintiff's complaint which sought to make out a case under the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act, G.L.c. 12, § 11I. We transferred the plaintiff's appeal to this court on our own motion.”
Wilber v. Curtis, 872 F.3d 15 (1st Cir. 2017). “§ 1983 and Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 12, § 11I, and as to Officer Rogers on the malicious prosecution and false arrest claims.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.