Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 139, § 16A (2026)

Enjoining maintenance of nuisance; order closing building; judgment for permanent injunction; posting of order

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 16A. Upon a civil action brought in the name of the commonwealth by the attorney general, or district attorney for the district, or the chief of police, or the board or officer having control of the police of the state, or of a town or city, or by not less than ten legal voters of a town or city, in their own names, stating that a building, place or tenement situated therein is being used for the illegal keeping, sale or manufacture of alcoholic beverages, as defined in section one of chapter one hundred and thirty-eight or houses a premises which is licensed under section twelve of said chapter one hundred and thirty-eight and on or in such premises alcoholic beverages are habitually served to persons who are intoxicated or alcoholic beverages are served to persons whom the operators of said premises know or have reason to know will operate a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of subdivision (1) of section twenty-four of chapter ninety or is used for the illegal keeping, sale or manufacture of controlled substances, as defined in section one of chapter ninety-four C, the superior court may abate the same as a common nuisance and may enjoin the person conducting or maintaining the same, and the owner, lessee or agent of the building, place or tenement in or upon which said nuisance exists, and their grantees or assignees, from directly or indirectly maintaining or permitting such nuisance, and, subject to the provisions hereinafter contained, may order the effectual closing of such building, place or tenement, and the prohibition of its use for any purpose for a period of not less than one month nor more than one year thereafter; provided, however, that if said building, place or tenement contains other occupied dwelling units, the occupants of which were not involved in said nuisance, no such closing of other occupied dwelling units shall take place so as to adversely affect such occupants. Proceedings under this section shall be in the manner provided in sections seven to twelve, inclusive, except that the provisions of section nine regulating the closing of a building, place or tenement and the prohibition of its use for any purpose because of the maintenance of such nuisance shall not apply and in lieu thereof the court may include in its judgement an order for such closing and prohibition, if it appears that prior thereto and within the preceding three years there shall have been three convictions for the illegal sale, or keeping, or manufacture of alcoholic beverages as so defined, or two convictions in the preceding five years for the illegal sale or keeping or manufacture of a controlled substance as so defined in or upon the premises on which such building, place or tenement is situated, or three judgements for permanent injunction enjoining the maintenance of such nuisance. A judgement for a permanent injunction or abatement shall include an order that a copy thereof shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the building, place or tenement affected thereby, on or near one or more of its principal entrances and that the removal, defacement, erasure or mutilation of a copy so posted shall be contempt of court. In addition to such posting, a copy of the judgement shall be delivered in hand to the person in charge of such building, place or tenement if he may be found upon the premises or to anyone residing therein, and if the judgement includes an order for the effectual closing of said building, place or tenement and the prohibition of its use for any purpose for a period of not less than one month nor more than one year, a copy shall be filed forthwith for record in the registry of deeds for the county and registry district within which such building, place or tenement is situated. The provisions of section thirteen shall apply to all persons found in or upon premises used for the illegal sale, or keeping, or manufacture of alcoholic beverages or controlled substances, as so defined.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1960–1979 · leading case: Johnson v. Martignetti, 375 N.E.2d 290 (Mass. 1978).
Johnson v. Martignetti, 375 N.E.2d 290 (Mass. 1978). · cites it 4× “138, § 60, and G. L. c. 139, § 16A, 1 seeking to abate the use of a building on the ground that it was being used unlawfully as a liquor nuisance.”
Jasper v. Michael A. Dolan, Inc., 242 N.E.2d 540 (Mass. 1968). · cites it 3× “By this bill in equity brought under' G. L. c. 139, § 16A, the plaintiffs (fourteen voters of the city of Worcester) seek to enjoin the defendants from selling all-alcoholic beverages in a package store at 158 Belmont Street in that city, and to set aside the license that had…”
Lincoln v. Hillside Park 'N Shop, Inc., 346 N.E.2d 887 (Mass. 1976). · cites it 3× “The plaintiffs were “not less than ten legal voters” of Webster (petitioners) suing under G. L. c. 139, § 16A, to stop the sale of alcoholic beverages by some or all of the licensees as being illegal and a nuisance.”
Cleary v. Cardullo's, Inc., 198 N.E.2d 281 (Mass. 1964). “constitutes a liquor nuisance within” G. L. c. 139, § 16A, “for the reason, and none other, that .”
Largess v. Nore's, Inc., 170 N.E.2d 361 (Mass. 1960). · cites it 2× “This is a bill in equity brought under G. L. c. 139, § 16A, by more than ten legal voters of the city of Worcester to abate a nuisance at 393 Chandler Street resulting from the alleged unlicensed maintenance of a package store for the sale of alcoholic beverages by the defendant…”
Dubois v. Bd. of Selectmen, 319 N.E.2d 735 (Mass. App. Ct. 1974). · cites it 2× “The plaintiffs’ amended bill in equity purports to be brought under G. L. c. 139, § 16A, as amended through St.”
Baser v. Spaulding, 386 N.E.2d 1306 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979). · cites it 2× “The trial judge ruled that the defendant Spaulding has a valid license for the sale of all alcoholic beverages and entered judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint brought under G. L. c. 139, § 16A, as appearing in St. 1973, c.”
Powers v. Sixty Broadway, Inc., 356 N.E.2d 704 (Mass. 1976). “Twelve legal voters of the town of Nor-wood sought and obtained an injunction under G. L. c. 139, § 16A, as appearing in St. 1973, c.”
Cleary v. Licensing Comm'n, 186 N.E.2d 815 (Mass. 1962). “Had the petitioner not wished to rely upon the Attorney General, we are aware of no reason why there was not a proper and adequate statutory remedy in G. L. c. 139, § 16A. The respondents’ demurrers should have been sustained.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.