Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 166A, § 1

Definitions

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 1. The following terms as used in this chapter shall, unless the context requires otherwise, have the following meanings:—

''Community antenna television system'' or ''CATV system'', a facility as defined by federal law at 47 USC section 522 (7).

''CATV operator'' or ''Operator'', a person operating a CATV system.

''Department'', the department of telecommunications and cable established by chapter 25C.

''Division'', the division of community antenna television.

''Issuing authority'', the city manager of a city have a plan D or E charter, the mayor of any other city, or the board of selectmen of a town.

''Licensee'', a person who is issued a license pursuant to section 3.

''Area or areas to be served'', may include a municipality or a portion of a municipality in order to reflect within municipal boundaries, the various economic, cultural, geographic and community interests of the citizens residing therein.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1984–2013 · leading case: Olmstead v. Department of Telecommunications & Cable
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Olmstead v. Department of Telecommunications & Cable (2013) mass · cites it 6× “166A, § 1, as amended by St. 2007, c. 19, § 49. By redefining “department” in this way for the purposes of G.”
RCN-BecoCom, LLC v. Commissioner of Revenue (2005) mass · cites it 2× “166A) is an appropriate concern, G. L. c. 166A contains no preemption language.”
Mayor of Salem v. Warner Amex Cable Communications Inc. (1984) mass “Salem derived its authority to grant such a license from G. L. c. 166A, §§ 1 id) & 3. Paragraph 10 of the license agreement provided that “[t]he subscriber shall pay to the Licensee for the regular service received hereunder, the following charges [detailed in the contract],…”
Quincy Cablesystems, Inc. v. Sully's Bar, Inc. (1988) mad “M.G.L. c. 166A § 1. Quincy Cable is a CATV system.”
City of Springfield v. Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. (2009) mad “See Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 166A, §§ 1 et seq.; Mass.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.