Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 167D, § 19 (2026)

Recognition by bank of adverse claimants to deposits

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 19. No bank, federally-chartered bank or other corporation doing a banking business in the commonwealth, in this section called the depository, shall be required to recognize an adverse claim to a deposit standing on the depository's books to the credit of or to securities held for the account of any person, except by virtue of the service upon the depository of appropriate process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction in a suit or action to which such person, or the person's executors or administrators, has been made a party, unless the adverse claimant gives bond satisfactory to the depository and the adverse claimant to hold harmless and indemnify it from any liability, loss, damage, costs and expenses whatsoever on account of such adverse claim, or files with the depository an affidavit setting forth facts showing a reasonable cause for belief that a fiduciary relationship exists between such person and said adverse claimant and that such person is about to misappropriate the deposit or securities in question.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1995–2012 · leading case: Sovereign Bank v. Sturgis, 863 F. Supp. 2d 75 (D. Mass. 2012).
Sovereign Bank v. Sturgis, 863 F. Supp. 2d 75 (D. Mass. 2012). · cites it 2× “Sovereign responds that the withdrawal was a lawful setoff permitted by both G.L. c. 167D, § 19, and the common law. 4 *87 Chapter 167D, § 19, governing transfer of depositor funds as a consequence of the depositor’s debt to the bank, does not deal with the transaction at issue…”
Techbuilt Homes, Inc. v. Framingham Sav. Bank, 4 Mass. L. Rptr. 484 (Mass. Super. Ct. 1995). · cites it 3× “That count seeks recovery pursuant to M.G.L.c. 167D, §19. This statute provides a remedy for actual damages suffered as a result of a bank’s failure to send written notice by certified mail “forthwith” whenever a bank, as a consequence of a default of a debt owed to said bank by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.