Section 9. This chapter is declared to be remedial. Its purpose is to remove, and to afford relief from, uncertainty and insecurity with respect to rights, duties, status and other legal relations, and it is to be liberally construed and administered. Nothing in this chapter shall be held to affect the jurisdiction of the land court, and the procedure established hereby shall be in addition to any other procedure for declaratory relief.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
37
cases (
7 in the last 5 years), 1965–2025 · leading case:
Recinos v. Escobar, 46 N.E.3d 60 (Mass. 2016).
Recinos v. Escobar, 46 N.E.3d 60 (Mass. 2016).
“The plaintiff also argues that the Probate and Family Court has jurisdiction to enter declaratory relief under G. L. c. 231A, § 9, and that it is an appropriate method to enter the special findings for SIJ status.”
Babson v. Babson, 371 N.E.2d 430 (Mass. 1977).
· cites it 3× “G.L.c. 231A, § 9. Pursuant to our liberal construction of G.”
Timothy Braley v. William Bates., 100 Mass. App. Ct. 259 (Mass. App. Ct. 2021).
· cites it 2× “" G. L. c. 231A, § 9. As it pertains to administrative agencies, the statute "may be used in the superior court to enjoin and to obtain a determination of the legality of the administrative practices and procedures of any municipal, county or state agency or official which…”
Woods v. City of Newton, 208 N.E.2d 508 (Mass. 1965).
· cites it 3× “See G. L. c. 231A, § 9. 2 Giving landowners, in cases of actual controversy, a right alternative to that given by c.”
Nelson v. Comm'r of Corr., 456 N.E.2d 1100 (Mass. 1983).
“” G. L. c. 231A, § 9. See Jacobson v. Parks & Recreation Comm’n of Boston, 345 Mass.”
Town of Hadley v. Town of Amherst, 360 N.E.2d 623 (Mass. 1977).
“We have also been asked to define the limits of the powers granted in St. 1912, c. 484, for future instances.”
LOUIS M. CAPUTO, JR. v. KAREN M. MOULTON, 204 N.E.3d 1009 (Mass. App. Ct. 2023).
“538, 547 (2012), quoting G. L. c. 231A, § 9 ("declaratory judgment act must be 'liberally construed,' so as to effectuate its remedial goals of 'remov[ing], and .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.