Mass. Gen. Laws » Part I Title II Chapter 23A
Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 23A, § 3 (2026)

Divisions, officers and programs; website

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 3. (a) MOBD shall contain such divisions, offices and programs as the director shall determine are necessary to achieve the mission and administer the programs of MOBD.

(b) MOBD shall develop, operate and maintain a searchable website accessible by the public at no cost, to provide information on public and private resources available to small businesses and to promote small businesses in the commonwealth. Information made available through the searchable website shall include, but shall not be limited to:

(1) information on state, local, federal and private sector small business counseling and technical assistance programs;

(2) information on state, local and federal financing programs;

(3) information on state, local and federal procurement and contracting programs and opportunities, including information on the regional economic development organizations under the program established in sections 3J and 3K and opportunities;

(4) information on state incorporation laws and regulations, and the changes to state incorporation laws and regulations;

(5) information on state tax credits;

(6) information on workers' compensation laws, unemployment insurance laws and the health insurance obligations and options for employers; and

(7) other information and resources, as determined by the director of MOBD.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1966–1988 · leading case: Flotech, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours Co., 627 F. Supp. 358 (D. Mass. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Flotech, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours Co., 627 F. Supp. 358 (D. Mass. 1985). “Jurisdiction over Du Pont is properly exercised pursuant to the Massachusetts Long-Arm statute, Mass.Gen.Laws ch. 23A, § 3(a)-(d). Pursuant to Fed.”
Whistler Corp. v. Solar Elec., Inc., 684 F. Supp. 1126 (D. Mass. 1988). “In essence, Whistler asserts that this Court has personal jurisdiction over Solar because, although Solar deliberately sued the distributor of a Whistler product in another *1130 forum, the effect of such action was directed at the manufacturer in Massachusetts.”
Reynolds v. Comm'r of Com. & Dev., 214 N.E.2d 69 (Mass. 1966). “See G. L. c. 23A, § 3 (inserted by St. 1953, c.”
Power v. Sec'y of Dept of Cmty. Affairs, 388 N.E.2d 304 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979). “761, § 3, directs its attention to the first sentence of G.L.c. 23A, § 3, inserted by St. 1964, c.”
Power v. Sec'y of the Dep't of Cmty. Affairs, 388 N.E.2d 304 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979). “761, § 3, directs its attention to the first sentence of G. L. c. 23A, § 3, inserted by St. 1964, c.”
— Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 23A, § 3(a) — 1 case
Flotech, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours Co., 627 F. Supp. 358 (D. Mass. 1985). “Jurisdiction over Du Pont is properly exercised pursuant to the Massachusetts Long-Arm statute, Mass.Gen.Laws ch. 23A, § 3(a)-(d). Pursuant to Fed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.