Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 35, § 22 (2026)

Disposition of surplus money; deposits; investments; interest

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 22. Except as otherwise provided, county treasurers, clerks of the courts, clerks of district courts, sheriffs and superintendents of jails and houses of correction, probation officers, registers of probate and insolvency and registers of deeds, having more money in their hands than is required for immediate use, shall deposit it, in their official names, in national banks or trust companies in the commonwealth or banking companies doing business in the commonwealth and qualified to receive demand deposits under the provisions of section six A of chapter one hundred and seventy-two A, at the best practicable interest rates. County treasurers may also deposit in time deposits in such national banks, trust companies or banking companies and invest in United States treasury bills. Interest thereon shall be paid to the county, except that interest accruing to deposits by registers of probate and clerks of courts shall be paid to the commonwealth; provided, that interest accruing on the deposit as aforesaid of any money paid to any official mentioned in this section which is so paid under order of a court or which is otherwise subject to the direction of a court shall, if the court so directs, be paid to the parties entitled to the principal fund of such deposit.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1922–1982 · leading case: Clerk of Superior Court for Cnty. of Middlesex v. Treasurer & Receiver Gen., 437 N.E.2d 158 (Mass. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Clerk of Superior Court for Cnty. of Middlesex v. Treasurer & Receiver Gen., 437 N.E.2d 158 (Mass. 1982). · cites it 5× “The plaintiffs contend that certain statutes (G. L. c. 35, §§ 22, 23), 1 as well as a rule of the Superior Court (rule 22), 2 are inconsistent with, and contradict, any impli *524 cation of authority in the Chief Administrative Justice.”
Campbell v. Comm'r of Banks, 241 Mass. 262 (Mass. 1922). · cites it 2× “He received this money from litigants in pending cases in varying amounts under the rule and standing order of the Superior Court, and G. L. c. 35, §§ 22, 23. The single question open on this record, is whether the plaintiff is entitled to share in the assets of the trust…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.