Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 43, § 30 (2026)

Purchase or taking of land

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 30. At the request of any department, and with the approval of the mayor and city council under Plan A, B, C or F, or with the approval of the city manager and the city council under Plan D or E, the city council may, in the name of the city, purchase, or take by eminent domain, under chapter seventy-nine, any land within its limits for any municipal purpose, and, without the request of any department, but with like approval, the city council may, in the name of the city, purchase or take by eminent domain, under chapter seventy-nine, any land within its limits for the purpose of conveying the same, with or without consideration, to the commonwealth for the use of a regional community college. Whenever the price proposed to be paid for land for any municipal purpose is more than twenty-five per cent higher than its average assessed valuation during the previous three years the land shall not be purchased, but shall be taken as aforesaid. No land shall be taken or purchased until an appropriation by loan or otherwise for the general purpose for which land is needed has been made by the city council, by a two thirds vote of all its members; nor shall a price be paid in excess of the appropriation, unless a larger sum is awarded by a court of competent jurisdiction. All proceedings in the taking of land shall be under the advice of the law department, and a record thereof shall be kept by said department.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1949–2022 · leading case: Poremba v. City of Springfield, 238 N.E.2d 43 (Mass. 1968).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Poremba v. City of Springfield, 238 N.E.2d 43 (Mass. 1968). “552, 554-557 ) is given broad power to take land within its limits by eminent domain “for any municipal purpose,” in the manner stated in G. L. c. 43, § 30 (as amended through St.”
Said S. Abuzahra v. City of Cambridge., 101 Mass. App. Ct. 267 (Mass. App. Ct. 2022). “On this record, we see no basis to view the city council's exercise of eminent domain power as anything other than legislative in character and thus protected by legislative immunity and the associated legislative privilege.”
Shea v. Inspector of Bldgs., 83 N.E.2d 457 (Mass. 1949). “See G. L. c. 43, § 30. An easement is an interest in “land,” and it may be held “in fee.”
Harrington v. City of Worcester, 186 N.E.2d 185 (Mass. 1962). “The plaintiffs’ brief further alleges that there was not the necessary compliance with G. L. c. 43, § 30, which provides, in part, that: “No land shall be taken or purchased until an appropriation by loan or otherwise for the general purpose for which land is needed has been…”
Richmond Bros. v. City of Quincy, 279 N.E.2d 702 (Mass. 1972). “See G. L. c. 43, §§ 30 (as amended through St.”
City of Springfield v. Dreison Investments, Inc., 11 Mass. L. Rptr. 379 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2000). “Pursuant to the provisions of G.L.c. 43, §30, the City is authorized to take private property by eminent domain: At the request of any department, and with the approval of the mayor and Councillor under Plan A .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.