Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 79, § 7C (2026)

Notice of taking and amount of damages; contents; service

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 7C. Immediately after the right to damages becomes vested, the board of officers who have made a taking under this chapter shall give notice thereof to every person, including every mortgagee of record, whose property has been taken or who is otherwise entitled to damages on account of such taking. Such notice shall be in writing and shall describe in general terms the purpose and extent of the taking, and shall state the amount of damages, if any, awarded for such taking and the time and place at which he may obtain payment thereof, or, if no damages have been awarded, the time within which he may petition for an award of the same, and the time within which he may petition the superior court to determine his damages under section fourteen. Such notice may be served by personal service, or by leaving an attested copy thereof at the last and usual place of abode of the person to be notified if he is a resident of the commonwealth, by any person authorized to serve civil process, or notice may be given to persons within or without the commonwealth, by registered mail or other suitable means. Failure to give notice shall not affect the time within which a petition for damages may be filed, except as provided by section sixteen.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1973–1979 · leading case: Boyce v. Greater Lowell Reg'l Vocational Technical Sch. Dist., 389 N.E.2d 451 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Boyce v. Greater Lowell Reg'l Vocational Technical Sch. Dist., 389 N.E.2d 451 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979). “Section 16 provides for an extension of the time within which a land damage suit may be brought if the landowner does not receive notice of the taking as required by G. L. c. 79, § 7C. It is uncontroverted in this case that the plaintiffs received notice of the taking and of…”

Ace Fin. & Inv. Co. v. Boston Redevelopment Auth., 51 Mass. App. Dec. 41 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div. 1973). · cites it 2× “G.L. c. 79, §7C. *49 Upon the consummation of the eminent domain proceedings, the attachment of one of the creditors then changes in form from an attachment to an equitable lien.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.