Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 10.11 (2026)

Additional clerks and assistants; employment; compensation.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CLERKS AND ASSISTANTS

Act 6 of 1901

10.11 Additional clerks and assistants; employment; compensation.

Sec. 1.

The governor may from time to time employ clerks and assistants in addition to those already provided for by law, for service in his or her department, as the governor may consider necessary, the compensation of those clerks and assistants to be determined by the governor and to be paid from the general fund on the warrant of the state treasurer, in like manner as the salaries of state officers are paid.

History: 1901, Act 6, Imd. Eff. Feb. 5, 1901 ;-- CL 1915, 87 ;-- CL 1929, 124 ;-- CL 1948, 10.11 ;-- Am. 2002, Act 379, Imd. Eff. May 24, 2002

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1993–2024 · leading case: Nederhood v. Cadillac Malleable Iron Co., 518 N.W.2d 390 (Mich. 1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Nederhood v. Cadillac Malleable Iron Co., 518 N.W.2d 390 (Mich. 1994). · cites it 4× “[4] Favored work has been defined as work offered by the employer to a disabled worker that was limited or restricted so as to be within the worker's capacity to perform.”

Off. & Prof'l Employees Int'l Union, Local 494 v. Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers, 311 F.R.D. 447 (E.D. Mich. 2015). “§ 10.11.) The Settlement Agreement *453 provides that the initial Independent Members and Chair “shall be selected by mutual agreement by the UAW, Staff Council and OPEIU, and Class Counsel” and shall be designated in the order approving the settlement.”

Wade v. Gen. Motors Corp., 501 N.W.2d 248 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993). “A fair reading of both opinions reveals that separate determinations *270 were made regarding plaintiff’s wage-earning capacity and disability.”

Diederichs v. FCA US LLC (E.D. Mich. 2024). · cites it 2× “03, severability clause in Section 10.11, and binding effect clause in Section 10.”

Holmes v. FCA US LLC A/K/A Fiat Chrysler Automobiles & FCA, FCA US LLC, Long Term Disability Benefit Plan (E.D. Mich. 2022). “03, severability clause in Section10.11, and binding effect clause in Section 10.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.