Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 102.6 (2026)

Thoroughfares; expense of grading, payment.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE FOURTH CLASS CITY ACT


Act 215 of 1895


102.6 Thoroughfares; expense of grading, payment.

Sec. 6.

    Whenever any street, alley or public highway shall have been graded, or pavement shall have been constructed in conformity to grades established by authority of the city, and the expense thereof shall have been assessed upon lots or lands bounded by or abutting upon such street, alley or public highway, the owner or owners of such lots or lands shall not be subject to any special assessment occasioned by any subsequent change of grade in such pavement, street, alley or public highway, unless such change be asked for by a majority of the owners of such lots or lands; but the expense of all improvements occasioned by such change of grade shall be chargeable to and paid by the city.

History: 1895, Act 215, Eff. Aug. 30, 1895 ;-- CL 1897, 3178 ;-- CL 1915, 3092 ;-- CL 1929, 2016 ;-- CL 1948, 102.6

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2018–2023 · leading case: Nagam Nabil Jamel v. Wbr Kings Arms LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
Nagam Nabil Jamel v. Wbr Kings Arms LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “2 With respect to existing structures, the 2015 code, Section 102.6, provides that: “The legal occupancy of any structure existing on the date of adoption of this code shall be permitted to continue without change, except as otherwise specifically provided in this code, the…”
Est. of Charles Meredith v. Brt Props. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “But beyond merely being unable to carry his burden of producing some admissible evidence to preclude summary disposition, plaintiff’s position actually is undercut by the admissible evidence.”
Est. of Charles Meredith v. Brt Props. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “But beyond merely being unable to carry his burden of producing some admissible evidence to preclude summary disposition, plaintiff’s position actually is undercut by the admissible evidence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.