Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 117 / Act 279 of 1909
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 117.30 (2026)

Appeal to circuit court; recognizance or bond.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE HOME RULE CITY ACT


Act 279 of 1909


117.30 Appeal to circuit court; recognizance or bond.

Sec. 30.

    In all actions and prosecutions arising under the charter and ordinances of the city the right of appeal to the circuit court of the county, or to a court having jurisdiction, shall be allowed to a party, and the same recognizance or bond shall be given as is or may be required by law in analogous cases on appeal from the court that tried the city charter or ordinance violation.

History: 1909, Act 279, Eff. Sept. 1, 1909 ;-- CL 1915, 3333 ;-- CL 1929, 2266 ;-- CL 1948, 117.30 ;-- Am. 1978, Act 191, Imd. Eff. June 4, 1978

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1984–2017 · leading case: People v. McKendrick, 468 N.W.2d 903 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. McKendrick, 468 N.W.2d 903 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991). “See MCL 117.30; MSA 5.2110. *141 We conclude that due process in this case does not require a preabatement hearing and that defendant’s constitutional guarantees were not infringed.”
City of Ann Arbor v. Michigan, 347 N.W.2d 10 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). “The home rule cities act, MCL 117.1 et seq.; MSA 5.2071 et seq., requires that such cities provide in their charters "[f]or the public peace and health and for the safety of persons and property”.”
Mkt. Place v. City of Ann Arbor, 351 N.W.2d 607 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). “2073(h); and (4) a provision outlining a procedure for the levy and collection of taxes in conformity with general laws, or in other words, general property taxes, MCL 117.30); MSA 5.20730). The home rule cities act also permits a home rule city charter to provide, "For laying…”
Joshua Stewart Eldenbrady v. City of Muskegon (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “-3- (c) Additional notice shall be provided as outlined and adopted by the city commission policy.”
Joshua Stewart Eldenbrady v. City of Muskegon (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “-3- (c) Additional notice shall be provided as outlined and adopted by the city commission policy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.