Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 124.758 (2026)

Receipt of tax, penalty, or interest payments; return to local tax collecting unit; retention of proceeds.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

LAND BANK FAST TRACK ACT


Act 258 of 2003


124.758 Receipt of tax, penalty, or interest payments; return to local tax collecting unit; retention of proceeds.

Sec. 8.

    (1) Money received by an authority as payment of taxes, penalties, or interest, or from the redemption or sale of property subject to a tax lien of any taxing unit shall be returned to the local tax collecting unit in which the property is located for distribution on a pro rata basis to the appropriate taxing units in an amount equal to delinquent taxes, penalties, and interest owed on the property, if any.

    (2) Except as otherwise provided in this act, as required by other law, as required under the provisions of a deed, or as an authority otherwise agrees, any proceeds received by the authority may be retained by the authority for the purposes of this act.

History: 2003, Act 258, Imd. Eff. Jan. 5, 2004

Compiler's Notes:

    For transfer of powers and duties relative to land bank fast track act, 2003 PA 258, performed by Michigan strategic fund to Michigan state housing development authority, see E.R.O. No. 2013-3, compiled at MCL 125.1393.

    For abolishment of the existing board of directors and position of director of the state land bank fast track authority, the renaming the state land bank fast track authority to the state land bank authority, the type I transfer of the powers and duties of the state land bank authority, including revenue bonding powers from the Michigan strategic fund, to the department of labor and economic opportunity, and the reestablishment of the board of directors of the state land bank authority, see E.R.O. No. 2019-3, compiled at MCL 125.1998.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: City of Highland Park v. State Land Bank Auth. (Mich. Ct. App. 2022).
City of Highland Park v. State Land Bank Auth. (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “And defendant may hold and own in its name any property acquired by it or conveyed to it by this state, a foreclosing governmental unit, a local unit of government, an intergovernmental entity created under the laws of this state, or any other public or private person, 2 MCL…”
City of Highland Park v. State Land Bank Auth. (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “And defendant may hold and own in its name any property acquired by it or conveyed to it by this state, a foreclosing governmental unit, a local unit of government, an intergovernmental entity created under the laws of this state, or any other public or private person, 2 MCL…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.