STILLE-DEROSSETT-HALE SINGLE STATE CONSTRUCTION CODE ACT
Act 230 of 1972
125.1501 Short title.
Sec. 1.
This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Stille-DeRossett-Hale single state construction code act".
History: 1972, Act 230, Eff. Jan. 1, 1973 ;-- Am. 1999, Act 245, Imd. Eff. Dec. 28, 1999
Compiler's Notes:
Former MCL 125.1501 to 125.1512, deriving from Act 304 of 1969 and pertaining to bonds for urban redevelopment, were rejected by the voters at the general election of November 3, 1970.
For transfer of powers and duties relating to the promulgation of rules by the state construction code commission from the department of labor to the director of the department of consumer and industry services, see E.R.O. No. 1996-2, compiled at MCL 445.2001 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.
For transfer of powers and duties of the executive director of the state construction code commission to the director of the department of consumer and industry services, and abolishment of the position, see E.R.O. No. 1996-2, compiled at MCL 445.2001 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.
PopularName Notes:
Act 230
PopularName Notes:
Uniform Construction Code
Notes of Decisions
Cummins v. Robinson Township (2009)
michctapp
“The underlying dispute in these cases involves the application of the Single State Construction Code Act (SSCCA), MCL 125.1501 et seq. At the times pertinent to these actions (2004 and 2005), the applicable building code in Michigan was, with certain exceptions, the…”
Burt Township v. Department of Natural Resources (1999)
mich · cites it 2×
“However, we note that the decisions in Cody Park Ass'n, Lutheran High School Ass'n, and Addison Twp have since been "overruled" by subsequent legislative amendments of the statutes at issue in those cases. [4] MCL 125.271 et seq. ; MSA 5.2963(1) et seq.”
Rakowski v. Sarb (2006)
michctapp
“Further, the purpose of the construction code act is not to protect the public against harm by establishing construction standards and an inspection regime, but merely to establish the authority of the director of the Department of Consumer and Industry Services, now the…”
Frericks v. Highland Township (1998)
michctapp
“” *601 Plaintiffs argue that these regulations are invalid because the State Construction Code Act, MCL 125.1501 et seq.; MSA 5.2949(1) et seq.”
Western Casualty & Surety Group v. Coloma Township (1985)
michctapp
“, an enforcing agency may issue a permit for home construction only if the plans and specifications comply with state law and other applicable laws and ordinances, and a permit may be cancelled in case of a failure or neglect to comply with such enforcing provisions.”
Gibson v. Neelis (1998)
michctapp
“The State Construction Code Act of 1972, MCL 125.1501 et seq.; MSA 5.2949(1) el seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.