Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 14.141 (2026)

Investigation of books of township or school district or public officer thereof; procedure; duty of auditor general.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

EXAMINATION OF TOWNSHIP OR SCHOOL DISTRICT RECORDS


Act 52 of 1929


14.141 Investigation of books of township or school district or public officer thereof; procedure; duty of auditor general.

Sec. 1.

    Whenever in the opinion of the attorney general it shall appear that public interest requires an investigation, examination and/or audit of the books, records and accounts of any township or school district or any public officer thereof he may institute the same as provided herein. Such investigation, examination and/or audit shall not be ordered unless the same shall be requested in writing signed by at least 25 per cent of the registered electors of the township or school district setting forth specifically and in detail the reason therefor. Upon receipt of such request the attorney general may proceed and for that purpose may request the assistance of the auditor general or any of his clerks or assistants in the accounting division and may also call upon the prosecuting attorney of the county wherein such investigation, examination and/or audit is sought to be made for such help as he may deem necessary. It shall be the duty of the auditor general, his clerks or assistants and the prosecuting attorney to comply with such request. Fifty per centum of the expenses of the auditor general's department with respect to such investigation, examination, and/or audit shall be a charge against the township or school district, and shall be paid from the general fund of the school district or the contingent fund of the township.

History: 1929, Act 52, Eff. Aug. 28, 1929 ;-- CL 1929, 195 ;-- Am. 1939, Act 20, Imd. Eff. Mar. 23, 1939 ;-- CL 1948, 14.141

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1966–1972 · leading case: Wayne Cnty. Prosecuting Attorney v. Wayne Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 205 N.W.2d 27 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).
Wayne Cnty. Prosecuting Attorney v. Wayne Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 205 N.W.2d 27 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972). “APPENDIX The conflicting statutes as set out by plaintiff are: STATUTORY CIVIL DUTIES OF PROSECUTOR MCLA 14.141; MSA 3.241: Audit books of school districts Mandatory duty of the prosecutor to comply with a request by 25% of the registered electors to assist in an investigation,…”
Burton Twp. v. Speck, 144 N.W.2d 347 (Mich. 1966). “PA 1929, No 52, as amended (CL 1948, § 14.141 et seq. [Stat Ann 1961 Eev § 3.241 et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.