Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 141.502 (2026)

Income tax; prohibited to villages; uniform city income tax ordinance; prior ordinance.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CITY INCOME TAX ACT


Act 284 of 1964


141.502 Income tax; prohibited to villages; uniform city income tax ordinance; prior ordinance.

Sec. 2.

    No village shall impose and collect any excise tax levied on or measured by income after January 1, 1964. Except as otherwise provided in this section, no city shall impose an excise tax levied on or measured by income until the lawful adoption by the city of the entire uniform city income tax ordinance as hereinafter set forth. No city shall impose and collect such an excise tax prior to January 1, 1965, except that a city which on January 1, 1964 had in effect a valid ordinance levying and imposing such an excise tax may continue to levy and impose the tax under such ordinance until the uniform city income tax ordinance becomes effective in such city, but in no case shall such ordinance or any other income tax ordinance, in effect in such city prior to the effective date of the uniform city income tax ordinance, continue in effect later than December 31, 1964. The enforcement, collection and refund provisions with respect to liabilities incurred under such prior income tax ordinance shall continue in effect for the period provided for in such prior ordinance.

History: 1964, Act 284, Imd. Eff. June 12, 1964

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1977–1999 · leading case: City of Detroit v. Muzzin & Vincenti, Inc., 254 N.W.2d 599 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977).
City of Detroit v. Muzzin & Vincenti, Inc., 254 N.W.2d 599 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “Since the plaintiff adopted the Uniform City Income Tax Ordinance verbatim, see MCLA 141.502; MSA 5.3194(2), we shall refer for convenience solely to the statute.”
Wyckoff v. City of Detroit, 591 N.W.2d 71 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “Because respondent has adopted the ucito without material alteration, see MCL 141.502; MSA 5.3194(2), we shall refer only to the provisions of the ucito in this opinion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.