Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 15.564 (2026)

Public employer contribution to medical benefit plan; limitation on percentage of annual costs; allocation of employees' share of total costs.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PUBLICLY FUNDED HEALTH INSURANCE CONTRIBUTION ACT


Act 152 of 2011


15.564 Public employer contribution to medical benefit plan; limitation on percentage of annual costs; allocation of employees' share of total costs.

Sec. 4.

    (1) By a majority vote of its governing body each year, prior to the beginning of the medical benefit plan coverage year, a public employer, excluding this state, may elect to comply with this section for a medical benefit plan coverage year instead of the requirements in section 3. The designated state official may elect to comply with this section instead of section 3 as to medical benefit plans for state employees and state officers.

    (2) For medical benefit plan coverage years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, a public employer shall pay not more than 80% of the total annual costs of all of the medical benefit plans it offers or contributes to for its employees and elected public officials. For purposes of this subsection, total annual costs includes the premium or illustrative rate of the medical benefit plan and all employer payments for reimbursement of co-pays, deductibles, and payments into health savings accounts, flexible spending accounts, or similar accounts used for health care but does not include beneficiary-paid copayments, coinsurance, deductibles, other out-of-pocket expenses, other service-related fees that are assessed to the coverage beneficiary, or beneficiary payments into health savings accounts, flexible spending accounts, or similar accounts used for health care. For purposes of this section, each elected public official who participates in a medical benefit plan offered by a public employer shall be required to pay 20% or more of the total annual costs of that plan. The public employer may allocate the employees' share of total annual costs of the medical benefit plans among the employees of the public employer as it sees fit.

History: 2011, Act 152, Imd. Eff. Sept. 27, 2011 ;-- Am. 2013, Act 271, Imd. Eff. Dec. 30, 2013

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2015–2017 · leading case: Van Buren Cnty. Educ. Ass'n & Decatur Educ. Support Pers. Ass'n v. Decatur Pub. Schs., 872 N.W.2d 710 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
Van Buren Cnty. Educ. Ass'n & Decatur Educ. Support Pers. Ass'n v. Decatur Pub. Schs., 872 N.W.2d 710 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 12× “563 or the 80% contribution plan (80/20 plan) in MCL 15.564, but nevertheless found that respondent did not violate its duty to bargain in this case.”
City of Wyandotte v. Police Officers Ass'n of Michigan (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “563 to MCL 15.564. Public employers that elect the 80/20 option must follow MCL 15.”
Shelby Twp. v. Command Officers Ass'n of Michigan (Mich. 2017). “The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the calculation and/or allocation of payments for medical benefit plan costs among employees under the Publicly Funded Health Insurance Contribution Act, 2011 Public Act 152, specifically MCL 15.564, is a…”
Shelby Twp. v. Command Officers Ass'n of Michigan (Mich. 2017). “The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the calculation and/or allocation of payments for medical benefit plan costs among employees under the Publicly Funded Health Insurance Contribution Act, 2011 Public Act 152, specifically MCL 15.564, is a…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 15.564(1) — 1 case
Van Buren Cnty. Educ. Ass'n & Decatur Educ. Support Pers. Ass'n v. Decatur Pub. Schs., 872 N.W.2d 710 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “563 or the 80% contribution plan (80/20 plan) in MCL 15.564, but nevertheless found that respondent did not violate its duty to bargain in this case.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 15.564(2) — 1 case
Van Buren Cnty. Educ. Ass'n & Decatur Educ. Support Pers. Ass'n v. Decatur Pub. Schs., 872 N.W.2d 710 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “563 or the 80% contribution plan (80/20 plan) in MCL 15.564, but nevertheless found that respondent did not violate its duty to bargain in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.