Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 15.565 (2026)

Collective bargaining agreement or other contract in effect; inconsistent terms.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PUBLICLY FUNDED HEALTH INSURANCE CONTRIBUTION ACT

Act 152 of 2011

15.565 Collective bargaining agreement or other contract in effect; inconsistent terms.

Sec. 5.

(1) If a collective bargaining agreement or other contract that is inconsistent with sections 3 and 4 is in effect for 1 or more employees of a public employer on September 27, 2011, the requirements of section 3 or 4 do not apply to an employee covered by that contract until the contract expires. A public employer's expenditures for medical benefit plans under a collective bargaining agreement or other contract described in this subsection shall be excluded from calculation of the public employer's maximum payment under section 4. The requirements of sections 3 and 4 apply to any extension or renewal of the contract.

(2) A collective bargaining agreement or other contract that is executed on or after September 27, 2011 shall not include terms that are inconsistent with the requirements of sections 3 and 4.

History: 2011, Act 152, Imd. Eff. Sept. 27, 2011 ;-- Am. 2013, Act 272, Imd. Eff. Dec. 30, 2013

Compiler's Notes:

Enacting section 1 of Act 272 of 2013 provides:

"Enacting section 1. This amendatory act clarifies the original intent of the legislature that September 27, 2011 is the date on and after which a new contract must comply with this act. This amendatory act is curative and applies retroactively."

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2015 · leading case: Van Buren Cnty. Educ. Ass'n & Decatur Educ. Support Pers. Ass'n v. Decatur Pub. Schs., 872 N.W.2d 710 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Van Buren Cnty. Educ. Ass'n & Decatur Educ. Support Pers. Ass'n v. Decatur Pub. Schs., 872 N.W.2d 710 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 5× “[MCL 15.565 (emphasis added).] *635 Section 9 of the act contains a penalty for failure to comply with the contributions limit: If a public employer fails to comply with this act, the public employer shall permit the state treasurer to reduce by 10% each economic vitality…”

City of Wyandotte v. Police Officers Ass'n of Michigan (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “See MCL 15.565. If a public employer does not enact the healthcare cost-sharing as required by PFHICA, the state reduces by 10% the “economic vitality payments” to that public employer.”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 15.565(1) — 1 case

Van Buren Cnty. Educ. Ass'n & Decatur Educ. Support Pers. Ass'n v. Decatur Pub. Schs., 872 N.W.2d 710 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “[MCL 15.565 (emphasis added).] *635 Section 9 of the act contains a penalty for failure to comply with the contributions limit: If a public employer fails to comply with this act, the public employer shall permit the state treasurer to reduce by 10% each economic vitality…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.