Mich. Comp. Laws § 16.375
Department of corrections; creation.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
EXECUTIVE ORGANIZATION ACT OF 1965
Act 380 of 1965
16.375 Department of corrections; creation.
Sec. 275.
There is hereby created a department of corrections.
History: 1965, Act 380, Imd. Eff. July 23, 1965
PopularName Notes:
Act 380Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1986–2021 · leading case: People v. Moore
People v. Moore (1989)
“[24] Const 1963, art 5, § 2, ¶ 1; MCL 16.375, 791.201; MSA 3.29(275), 28.2271.”
Lickfeldt v. Department of Corrections (2001)
“§ 16.375, and is an administrative agency within the executive branch of Michigan's government.”
People v. Jahner (1989)
“The independent nature of sentencing and parole stems from the fact that these powers flow from different branches of government.”
Hopkins v. Parole Board (2000)
“The Department of Corrections originated within chapter 12 of the Executive Organization Act, MCL 16.375; MSA 3.29(275), and represents an administrative agency within the executive branch of Michigan’s government.”
People v. Raihala (1993)
“Const 1963, art 5, § 2; see also MCL 16.375; MSA 3.29(275). The power to parole is vested in the Department of Corrections, "[s]ubject to constitutional powers vested in the .”
In Re Parole of Bivings (2000)
“The MDOC was created by chapter 12 of the Executive Organization Act, MCL 16.375; MSA 3.29(275), and represents an administrative agency within the executive branch of Michigan’s government.”
Collins v. Director, Department of Corrections (1986)
“MCL 16.375; MSA 3.29(275). The Department of Corrections has exclusive jurisdiction over pardons, reprieves, commutations and paroles.”
People of Michigan v. Shad Ryan Armstrong (2021)
“MCL 16.375; Collins v Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 153 Mich App 477, 481 ; 395 NW2d 77 (1986).”
People of Michigan v. Shad Ryan Armstrong (2021)
“MCL 16.375; Collins v Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 153 Mich App 477, 481 ; 395 NW2d 77 (1986).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.