Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 169.222 (2026)

Duties of committee treasurer or other designated individual; preservation and inspection of committee records; violation; civil fine.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN CAMPAIGN FINANCE ACT

Act 388 of 1976

169.222 Duties of committee treasurer or other designated individual; preservation and inspection of committee records; violation; civil fine.

Sec. 22.

A committee treasurer or other individual designated on the statement of organization as responsible for the committee's record keeping, report preparation, or report filing shall keep detailed accounts, records, bills, and receipts as required to substantiate the information contained in a statement or report filed pursuant to this act or rules promulgated under this act. The treasurer shall record the name and address of a person from whom a contribution is received. The records of a committee shall be preserved for 5 years and shall be made available for inspection as authorized by the secretary of state. A treasurer or other individual designated as responsible for the committee's record keeping, report preparation, or report filing who knowingly violates this section is subject to a civil fine of not more than $1,000.00.

History: 1976, Act 388, Eff. June 1, 1977 ;-- Am. 1989, Act 95, Imd. Eff. June 21, 1989 ;-- Am. 1999, Act 237, Eff. Mar. 10, 2000

AdminRule Notes:

R 169.1 et seq. of the Michigan Administrative Code.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: In Re Investigative Subpoenas, 779 N.W.2d 277 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Investigative Subpoenas, 779 N.W.2d 277 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “The MCFA specifies that one requisite report, a committee’s campaign statement, shall contain specific information about “the total amount of contributions received during” a reporting period, comprehensive detail about fund raising efforts, the identities of campaign…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.