Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 205.749 (2026)

Fees; Michigan tax tribunal fund; creation; deposit of fees; money remaining in fund at close of fiscal year; use.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TAX TRIBUNAL ACT


Act 186 of 1973


205.749 Fees; Michigan tax tribunal fund; creation; deposit of fees; money remaining in fund at close of fiscal year; use.

Sec. 49.

    (1) The tribunal by rule shall prescribe filing fees and other fees to be paid in connection with a proceeding before the tribunal. The fees shall be paid to the clerk of the tribunal and by order of the tribunal may be taxed as costs.

    (2) The residential property and small claims division of the tribunal shall not charge fees or costs on appeals of principal residence property as defined in rules promulgated by the tax tribunal.

    (3) The Michigan tax tribunal fund is created in the department of labor and economic growth as a separate interest bearing fund. All fees collected pursuant to this act shall be deposited in the Michigan tax tribunal fund. The state treasurer shall direct the investment of the Michigan tax tribunal fund. Money in the Michigan tax tribunal fund shall remain in the Michigan tax tribunal fund at the close of the fiscal year and shall not revert to the general fund. Money in the Michigan tax tribunal fund shall be used solely for operation of the tribunal.

History: 1973, Act 186, Eff. July 1, 1974 ;-- Am. 1980, Act 437, Imd. Eff. Jan. 14, 1981 ;-- Am. 2008, Act 126, Imd. Eff. May 9, 2008

AdminRule Notes:

    R 205.1101 et seq. of the Michigan Administrative Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1982–1982 · leading case: Romulus City Treasurer v. Wayne Cnty. Drain Comm'r, 322 N.W.2d 152 (Mich. 1982).
Romulus City Treasurer v. Wayne Cnty. Drain Comm'r, 322 N.W.2d 152 (Mich. 1982). · cites it 2× “MCL 205.749; MSA 7.650(49). The $50 fee is prescribed in 1979 AC, R 205.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.