Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 206.351 (2026)
Repealed. 2011, Act 38, Eff. Jan. 1, 2012.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
INCOME TAX ACT OF 1967
Act 281 of 1967
206.351 Repealed. 2011, Act 38, Eff. Jan. 1, 2012.
Repealed. 2011, Act 38, Eff. Jan. 1, 2012.
Compiler's Notes:
The repealed section pertained to deducting and withholding tax on compensation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1979–2001 · leading case: Lawrence v. Dep't of Treasury, 364 N.W.2d 733 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985).
Lawrence v. Dep't of Treasury, 364 N.W.2d 733 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “” MCL 206.351; MSA 7.557(1351). The amount to be withheld is computed according to information obtained from the employee, unless the employer is otherwise directed by the commissioner of the revenue division of the department.”
Dep't of Treasury v. Sperandeo, 315 N.W.2d 863 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “The assessments were issued under MCL 206.351(1); MSA 7.557(1351)(1) which provided that every "employer” shall withhold employment taxes.”
Hartung v. State, Dep't of Labor, 22 P.3d 1 (Alaska 2001). “96 (5) (corporate taxes); Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 205.65 (2) (sales taxes); Mich.”
Ducharmes & Co., Inc. v. State of Mich., 75 B.R. 71 (E.D. Mich. 1987). “§ 7401 , and for Michigan under MCLA § 206.351. The IRS and the State, appellees here, objected claiming that a debtor was not entitled to designate payments for application to its unpaid trust fund tax liability because such payments under a reorganization plan were involuntary.”
Molter v. Dep't of Treasury, 484 N.W.2d 702 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992). “Because we have found that plaintiffs equal protection rights have not been violated, we do not feel compelled to address this issue.”
Detroit Hilton Ltd. P'ship v. Dep't of Treasury, 373 N.W.2d 586 (Mich. 1985). “” Section 351(1) of the Income Tax Act of 1967, MCL 206.351(1); MSA 7.557(1351X1), makes it clear that the so-called "withholding tax” is an obligation imposed only on persons who act as employers.”
Michigan Bell Tel. Co. v. C & C Excavating Co., 276 N.W.2d 487 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). “The Department of Treasury contends that it is entitled to the fund by virtue of withholding and motor fuel tax liens authorized by MCL 206.351; MSA 7.557(1351), MCL 206.431; MSA 7.”
Nosanchuk v. Dep't of Treasury, 337 N.W.2d 66 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “557(1351X3). Until recently, the income tax act did not expressly address the personal liability of corporate officers for payment of payroll withholding taxes.”
Helder v. Michigan (In re Helder), 43 B.R. 40 (W.D. Mich. 1984). “Mich. Comp.Laws § 206.351 (Mich.Stat.Ann.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 206.351(1) — 4 cases
Dep't of Treasury v. Sperandeo, 315 N.W.2d 863 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “The assessments were issued under MCL 206.351(1); MSA 7.557(1351)(1) which provided that every "employer” shall withhold employment taxes.”
Detroit Hilton Ltd. P'ship v. Dep't of Treasury, 373 N.W.2d 586 (Mich. 1985). “” Section 351(1) of the Income Tax Act of 1967, MCL 206.351(1); MSA 7.557(1351X1), makes it clear that the so-called "withholding tax” is an obligation imposed only on persons who act as employers.”
Molter v. Dep't of Treasury, 484 N.W.2d 702 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992). “Because we have found that plaintiffs equal protection rights have not been violated, we do not feel compelled to address this issue.”
Nosanchuk v. Dep't of Treasury, 337 N.W.2d 66 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “557(1351X3). Until recently, the income tax act did not expressly address the personal liability of corporate officers for payment of payroll withholding taxes.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 206.351(3) — 2 cases
Dep't of Treasury v. Sperandeo, 315 N.W.2d 863 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “The assessments were issued under MCL 206.351(1); MSA 7.557(1351)(1) which provided that every "employer” shall withhold employment taxes.”
Nosanchuk v. Dep't of Treasury, 337 N.W.2d 66 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “557(1351X3). Until recently, the income tax act did not expressly address the personal liability of corporate officers for payment of payroll withholding taxes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.