THE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX ACT
Act 206 of 1893
211.131e Repealed. 2006, Act 611, Eff. Dec. 31, 2014.
Repealed. 2006, Act 611, Eff. Dec. 31, 2014.
Compiler's Notes:
Former MCL 211.131, which pertained to extension of redemption period, was repealed by enacting section 2 of 2005 PA 183, Eff. Dec. 31, 2006. MCL 211.131e was amended by 2006 PA 611, Imd. Eff. Jan. 3, 2007.
Enacting section 4 of Act 611 of 2006 provides: "Enacting section 4. Section 131e of the general property tax act, 1893 PA 206, MCL 211.131e, as amended by this amendatory act, is retroactive and is effective for all property the title to which vested in this state under section 131e of the general property tax act, 1893 PA 206, MCL 211.131e, after October 25, 1976.
"Enacting section 5 of Act 611 of 2006 provides: "Enacting section 5. This amendatory act is not intended to and shall not be construed to modify or alter the ruling of the Michigan supreme court in Smith v Cliffs on the Bay Condominium Association, docket no. 111587."
PopularName Notes:
Act 206
Notes of Decisions
Ross v. State of Michigan, 662 N.W.2d 36 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 12× “Plaintiff claimed that he was never given the opportunity to redeem the property and asked that the deed to defendant Altaii be set aside.”
Smith v. Cliffs on the Bay Condo. Ass'n, 617 N.W.2d 536 (Mich. 2000).
· cites it 8× “§ 211.131e; MSA 7.190(3), which says that the notice was returned by the post office as "Not Deliverable As Addressed.”
Brandon Twp. v. Tomkow, 535 N.W.2d 268 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995).
· cites it 14× “The Township cross-appeals from the judge’s ruling that MCL 211.131e; MSA 7.190(3) is constitutional, naming both the Tomkows and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (dnr) as cross-appellees.”
Repub. Bank v. Genesee Cnty. Treasurer, 690 N.W.2d 917 (Mich. 2005).
· cites it 2× “The mailing to this last known address was returned by the post office as not deliverable. The owner contended that under this circumstance, the notice was inadequate, and that additional efforts should have been undertaken to ascertain the owner's current address.”
Crawford v. State, 527 N.W.2d 30 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994).
· cites it 4× “MCL 211.131e(2); MSA 7.190(3)(2). Pursuant to a telephone conversation with Thomas Willard, a manager employed by *120 the Department of Treasury, plaintiffs’ attorney filed a written request for relief in lieu of appearing at the hearing.”
Buckeye Union Fire Ins. v. State, 178 N.W.2d 476 (Mich. 1970).
· cites it 2× “3 Section 131c of The General Property Tax Act, as added by PA 1951, No 167, being MCLA § 211.131e (Stat Ann 1960 Rev § 7.190 [1]).”
City of Flint v. Takacs, 449 N.W.2d 699 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989).
· cites it 5× “The record owner is entitled to notice in accordance with MCL 211.131e; MSA 7.190(3), which prior to amendments enacted under 1984 PA 406 not applicable to the issues raised here provided: (1) The redemption period on those lands deeded to the state pursuant to section 67a[ 1 ]…”
Consol. Rail Corp. v. State of Mich., 976 F. Supp. 1085 (W.D. Mich. 1996).
· cites it 3× “A show cause hearing is scheduled for this second redemption period, and the county treasurer must notify the property owner of the hearing and proof of notice must be recorded with the register of deeds in the county in which the property is located.”
City of Detroit v. Adamo, 593 N.W.2d 646 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 5× “1 MCL 211.131e(2); MSA 7.190(3)(2). MCL 211.”
Smith v. Cliffs on the Bay Condo. Ass'n, 573 N.W.2d 296 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997).
· cites it 3× “131e(l) of the General Property Tax Act, MCL 211.131e(l); MSA 7.190(3)(1), provides that the “redemption period on property deeded to the state .”
Ottaco, Inc. v. Kalport Dev. Co., Inc., 607 N.W.2d 403 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000).
“…1991 delinquent tax bills were returned by the post office as undeliverable. 9 MCL 211.140(l)(a); MSA 7.198(l)(a). 10 MCL 211.131e; MSA 7.190(3).”
WAYNE CTY. Exec. v. Mayor of the City of Detroit, 535 N.W.2d 199 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995).
“Finally, the trial court did not err in ruling that *248 the city was not entitled to a hearing pursuant to MCL 211.131e; MSA 7.190(3) because it was not an owner of a significant property interest in the lands.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.131e(1) — 3 cases
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.131e(2) — 3 cases
Crawford v. State, 527 N.W.2d 30 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994).
“MCL 211.131e(2); MSA 7.190(3)(2). Pursuant to a telephone conversation with Thomas Willard, a manager employed by *120 the Department of Treasury, plaintiffs’ attorney filed a written request for relief in lieu of appearing at the hearing.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.131e(3) — 4 cases
Crawford v. State, 527 N.W.2d 30 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994).
“MCL 211.131e(2); MSA 7.190(3)(2). Pursuant to a telephone conversation with Thomas Willard, a manager employed by *120 the Department of Treasury, plaintiffs’ attorney filed a written request for relief in lieu of appearing at the hearing.”
City of Flint v. Takacs, 449 N.W.2d 699 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989).
“The record owner is entitled to notice in accordance with MCL 211.131e; MSA 7.190(3), which prior to amendments enacted under 1984 PA 406 not applicable to the issues raised here provided: (1) The redemption period on those lands deeded to the state pursuant to section 67a[ 1 ]…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.131e(l) — 5 cases
Crawford v. State, 527 N.W.2d 30 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994).
“MCL 211.131e(2); MSA 7.190(3)(2). Pursuant to a telephone conversation with Thomas Willard, a manager employed by *120 the Department of Treasury, plaintiffs’ attorney filed a written request for relief in lieu of appearing at the hearing.”
Smith v. Cliffs on the Bay Condo. Ass'n, 573 N.W.2d 296 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997).
“131e(l) of the General Property Tax Act, MCL 211.131e(l); MSA 7.190(3)(1), provides that the “redemption period on property deeded to the state .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.