Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.22 (2026)

Incorrect statement; inability to obtain statement; examination under oath of person having knowledge of amount or value of property; books and records; affidavits; preservation; assessment.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX ACT


Act 206 of 1893


211.22 Incorrect statement; inability to obtain statement; examination under oath of person having knowledge of amount or value of property; books and records; affidavits; preservation; assessment.

Sec. 22.

    (1) If a supervisor, assessing officer, member of the state tax commission, or director or deputy director of the county tax or equalization department is satisfied that a statement required under section 19 is incorrect, or if a statement required under section 19 cannot be obtained from the person, firm, or corporation whose property is assessed, a supervisor, assessing officer, member of the state tax commission, or director or deputy director of the county tax or equalization department may examine, under oath to be administered by the supervisor, assessing officer, member of the state tax commission, or director or deputy director of the county tax or equalization department, any person he or she believes has knowledge of the amount or value of any property owned, held, or controlled by the person neglecting, refusing, or omitting to be examined or to furnish the statement required under section 19.

    (2) A person who files an affidavit claiming an exemption for personal property under section 9o shall maintain adequate books and records relating to the description; the date of purchase, lease, or acquisition; and the purchase price, lease amount, or value of all industrial personal property and commercial personal property owned by, leased by, or in the possession of that person or a related entity for 4 years after filing an affidavit claiming the exemption. A person who files an affidavit claiming an exemption for personal property under section 9o shall provide access to the books and records relating to the description; the date of purchase, lease, or acquisition; and the purchase price, lease amount, or value of all industrial personal property and commercial personal property owned by, leased by, or in the possession of that person or a related entity if requested by the assessor of the local tax collecting unit, county equalization department, or department of treasury for 4 years immediately succeeding the year in which that person files an affidavit claiming the exemption.

    (3) A person who files an affidavit claiming an exemption for personal property under section 9m or 9n shall maintain adequate books and records relating to the description; the date of purchase, lease, or acquisition; and the purchase price, lease amount, or value of that personal property; the customary industrial use for that personal property; and the asset classification grouping of that personal property as applied in mass appraisal techniques for assessing purposes until that personal property is no longer eligible for exemption under section 9m or 9n. A person who claims an exemption for personal property under section 9m or 9n shall provide access to the books and records relating to the description; the date of purchase, lease, or acquisition; and the purchase price, lease amount, or value of that personal property; the customary industrial use for that personal property; and the asset classification grouping of that personal property as applied in mass appraisal techniques for assessing purposes if requested by the assessor of the local tax collecting unit, county equalization department, or department of treasury in any year in which that person claims an exemption for that personal property under section 9m or 9n.

    (4) The assessor of a local tax collecting unit shall preserve all affidavits claiming an exemption for personal property filed under sections 9m, 9n, and 9o for not less than 4 years after completion of the assessment roll for which the affidavits are filed.

    (5) A supervisor or assessing officer is authorized to assess to a person, firm, or corporation subject to assessment the amount of real and personal property the supervisor or assessing officer considers reasonable and just.

History: 1893, Act 206, Eff. June 12, 1893 ;-- CL 1897, 3845 ;-- Am. 1899, Act 154, Imd. Eff. June 23, 1899 ;-- CL 1915, 4016 ;-- CL 1929, 3410 ;-- CL 1948, 211.22 ;-- Am. 1964, Act 275, Eff. Aug. 28, 1964 ;-- Am. 1982, Act 539, Eff. Mar. 30, 1983 ;-- Am. 1996, Act 126, Imd. Eff. Mar. 13, 1996 ;-- Am. 2013, Act 153, Imd. Eff. Nov. 5, 2013

PopularName Notes:

Act 206
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1970–2009 · leading case: Superior Hotels, LLC v. MacKinaw Twp., 765 N.W.2d 31 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009).
Superior Hotels, LLC v. MacKinaw Twp., 765 N.W.2d 31 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 6× “On appeal, this Court reviewed which of two statutory provisions, MCL 211.22 or MCL 211.154, might control the city’s claims.”
Ford Motor Co. v. City of Woodhaven, 716 N.W.2d 247 (Mich. 2006). · cites it 2× “MCL 211.22. Additionally, the assessing officer may send a written request to examine the taxpayer's property and books, and a certified personal property examiner of the taxing jurisdiction then conducts the examination and audits the records of the taxpayer.”
City of Detroit v. Norman Allan & Co., 309 N.W.2d 198 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 5× “The dispute concerns interpretation of two statutes which are possibly applicable to the facts of the instant case, MCL 211.22; MSA 7.22 and MCL 211.154; MSA 7.”
Geiger v. City of Southfield (In Re Cont'l Credit Corp.), 1 B.R. 680 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1979). · cites it 3× “” Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. § 211.22 provides in part: “If the .”
Topps of Warren, Inc. v. City of Warren, 183 N.W.2d 310 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970). · cites it 12× “It also has the power to investigate and correct irregularities arising from incorrect or false statements of valuation under MCLA § 211.22 (Stat Ann 1970 Cum Supp § 7.”
City of Detroit v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 258 N.W.2d 521 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “1963, art 4, § 25, the Tax Tribunal nevertheless has no jurisdiction of matters arising under either § 22 or § 154 of the General Property Tax Act, MCLA 211.22; MSA 7.22 and MCLA 211.154; MSA 7.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.