Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.22a (2026)

Personal property examiners; certification; powers; expenses; examination of property.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX ACT


Act 206 of 1893


211.22a Personal property examiners; certification; powers; expenses; examination of property.

Sec. 22a.

    (1)  The state tax commission, upon presentation by representatives of county tax or equalization departments, townships and cities, of satisfactory evidence of education, experience, or by passage of a test conducted by the commission, shall certify a successful applicant as a qualified personal property examiner. A certified personal property examiner may examine only the property or the cost records relating to such property of any corporation, firm, or individual liable to assessment within their county, township or city for property taxes under this act.

    (2) Upon written request of a city, village or township assessing officer to examine the property or books of any corporation, firm, or individual, a certified personal property examiner of the county tax or equalization department shall conduct the examination. Where there is no certified personal property examiner in the county equalization department, the examination shall be made by a representative of the state tax commission at the expense of the city, village or township.

    (3) Where any corporation, firm or individual is subject to personal property assessment in more than 3 counties of the state then the corporation, firm or individual may request an examination be made at their expense by a representative of the state tax commission at a rate of 1/10 of 1 mill of the gross value of the personal property of said corporation, firm or individual under examination.

History: Add. 1969, Act 40, Eff. Dec. 31, 1971

PopularName Notes:

Act 206
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1993–1993 · leading case: Gen. Motors Corp. v. State Tax Comm'n, 504 N.W.2d 10 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993).
Gen. Motors Corp. v. State Tax Comm'n, 504 N.W.2d 10 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993). “Furthermore, we fail to see how either the commission’s own rules or MCL 211.22a; MSA 7.22(1) precludes the commission from certifying Plante & Moran as personal-property examiners for purposes of conducting an audit under § 148.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.