Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.25a (2026)

Real estate index number system.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX ACT


Act 206 of 1893


211.25a Real estate index number system.

Sec. 25a.

    An assessing officer, with the approval of the governing body of the city or township, may establish a real estate index number system for listing real estate for purposes of assessment and collection of taxes, in addition to, or in lieu of, the method of listing by legal description provided in this act. The system shall describe real estate by county, township, section, block and parcel or lot. The numbering system shall be approved by the state tax commission. The assessing officer shall establish and maintain cross indexes of numbers assigned under the system with the complete legal description of the real estate to which such numbers relate. The assessing officer shall assign individual index numbers and the assessment rolls, tax rolls and tax statements shall carry the index numbers and not the legal descriptions, except that both the legal description and the index number shall be shown on the tax statements for the first year after this section is effective. Indexes established hereunder shall be open to public inspection.

History: Add. 1965, Act 101, Imd. Eff. June 28, 1965

PopularName Notes:

Act 206
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1982–1982 · leading case: Tobin v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 331 N.W.2d 184 (Mich. 1982).
Tobin v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 331 N.W.2d 184 (Mich. 1982). “10(1), MCL 211.25a; MSA 7.25(1). Information on corporate officers and directors is available through the Corporation and Securities Bureau.”
Kestenbaum v. Michigan State Univ., 327 N.W.2d 783 (Mich. 1982). “10(1), MCL 211.25a; MSA 7.25(1). Information on corporate officers and directors is available through the Corporations and Securities Bureau.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.