Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.34a (2026)

Tabular statement of tentative equalization ratios and estimated multipliers; preparation; publication; copies, notices; effect on equalization procedures; appeal.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX ACT


Act 206 of 1893


211.34a Tabular statement of tentative equalization ratios and estimated multipliers; preparation; publication; copies, notices; effect on equalization procedures; appeal.

Sec. 34a.

    (1)  The equalization director of each county shall prepare a tabular statement each year, by the several cities and townships of the county, showing the tentative recommended equalization ratios and estimated multipliers necessary to compute individual state equalized valuation of real property and of personal property. The county shall publish the tabulation in a newspaper of general circulation within the county on or before the third Monday in February each year and furnish a copy to each assessor and to each of the boards of review in the county and to the state tax commission. All notices of meetings of the boards of review shall give the tentative ratios and estimated multipliers pertaining to their jurisdiction. The tentative recommended equalization ratios and multiplying figures shall not prejudice the equalization procedures of the county board of commissioners or the state tax commission.

    (2) If the final equalization multiplier for only the 1986 tax year exceeds the tentative multiplier used in preparing the assessment notice and as a result of action of the state board of equalization or county board of commissioners a taxpayer's assessment as equalized is in excess of 50% of true cash value, that person may appeal directly to the tax tribunal. The appeal shall be filed under this subsection during 1986 on or before the third Monday in August and shall be heard in the same manner as other appeals of the tribunal. An appeal pursuant to this subsection shall not result in an equalized value less than the assesed value multiplied by the tentative equalization multiplier used in preparing the assessment notice.

History: Add. 1971, Act 165, Imd. Eff. Nov. 24, 1971 ;-- Am. 1975, Act 188, Imd. Eff. Aug. 2, 1975 ;-- Am. 1986, Act 138, Imd. Eff. June 30, 1986

Compiler's Notes:

    In the last sentence of subsection (2), the word “assesed” evidently should read “assessed”.

PopularName Notes:

Act 206
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2024 · leading case: Brittany Park Apts. v. Harrison Twp., 304 N.W.2d 488 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981).
Brittany Park Apts. v. Harrison Twp., 304 N.W.2d 488 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “14 MCL 211.34a; MSA 7.52(1). 15 MCL 211.34; MSA 7.”
City of Ironwood v. Gogebic Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 269 N.W.2d 642 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 2× “MCL 211.34a; MSA 7.52(1) provides for county equalization of the assessments submitted by each of its governmental units.”
Janey Grier v. State Tax Comm'n (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 4× “” The court stated that MCL 211.34a(5) required the assessor to determine the classification that most significantly influenced the total valuation of the subject property because the property usage included more than one classification.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.34a(5) — 1 case
Janey Grier v. State Tax Comm'n (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “” The court stated that MCL 211.34a(5) required the assessor to determine the classification that most significantly influenced the total valuation of the subject property because the property usage included more than one classification.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.