Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 213 / Act 295 of 1966
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 213.366 (2026)

Repealed. 1980, Act 87, Eff. Apr. 1, 1983.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAYS


Act 295 of 1966


213.366 Repealed. 1980, Act 87, Eff. Apr. 1, 1983.

    Repealed. 1980, Act 87, Eff. Apr. 1, 1983.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed sections pertained to petitions for acquisition of property, claims of fraud or abuse of discretion, surrender of possession of property, appointment of guardian ad litem, hearings, juries, evidence, notice, and compensation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1970–1989 · leading case: In Re Petition of State High. Comm'n, 178 N.W.2d 923 (Mich. 1970).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Petition of State High. Comm'n, 178 N.W.2d 923 (Mich. 1970). · cites it 5× “The American Oil Company, respondent-owner of one of the parcels involved, filed an answer in which it admitted the execution of said declaration of taking, but denied the validity thereof for the reason a good-faith offer to purchase the property had not been made as required…”
State High. Comm'n v. Vanderkloot, 220 N.W.2d 416 (Mich. 1974). · cites it 2× “Acting in accordance with MCLA 213.366; MSA 8.261(6) and MCLA 213.367; MSA 8.”
In Re Acquisition of Land for the Cent. Indus. Park Proj., 441 N.W.2d 27 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989). “Finally, plaintiff directs our attention to In re Petition of State Hwy Comm, 383 Mich 709, 716 ; 178 NW2d 923 (1970), wherein the Court considered a condemnation action brought under MCL 213.366; MSA 8.261(6), a predecessor to the statute involved in the case at bar.”
City of Fenton v. Lutz, 250 N.W.2d 579 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “Under MCLA 213.366 through MCLA 213.370; MSA 8.”
City of Muskegon v. Irwin, 187 N.W.2d 481 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 2× “MCLA §213.366 (Stat Ann 1958 Rev § 8.261 [6]) provides in part: “When the petitioner is unable to agree with any person interested in any private property for the purchase thereof, the petitioner, after making a good faith written offer to purchase the property, may file a…”
State High. Comm'n v. Davis, 197 N.W.2d 71 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972). “MCLA 213.366; MSA 8.261(6). This offer was rejected; and on July 30, 1968, the commission filed a petition and declaration of taking in Oakland County Circuit Court.”
State High. Comm'n v. Mobarak, 211 N.W.2d 539 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973). “261(7), notice to an affected property owner may be by service of a notice of taking and statement of estimated compensation pursuant to MCLA 213.366; MSA 8.261(6). 7 See United States v 1,060.”
State High. Comm'n v. Vanderkloot, 204 N.W.2d 22 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972). · cites it 2× “The statute in question, MCLA 213.366; MSA 8.261(6)(d) provides in part that the petition for acquisition of property shall contain: * * * "(b) A statement of purpose for which the property is being acquired, and any other pertinent matter of things, and may pray for any other…”
State High. Comm'n v. Haehnle, 244 N.W.2d 470 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976). “We do note, however, that defendants will now have another chance to show that the state failed to make a "good faith” offer as required by MCLA 213.366; MSA 8.261(6). Reversed. Costs to appellants.”
State High. Comm'n v. Abood, 269 N.W.2d 247 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). “MCL 213.366(1); MSA 8.261(6)(1) states in pertinent part: "When the petitioner is unable to agree with any person interested in any private property for the purchase thereof, the petitioner, after making a good faith written offer to purchase the property, may file a petition…”
State High. Comm'n v. Cronenwett, 216 N.W.2d 597 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 2× “Defendants argue that although the state initially complied with the statute at the time title vested, the statute was violated once a different valuation date was established, and that having violated the statute, MCLA 213.366; MSA 8.261(6) required the state to file a new good…”
City of Muskegon v. Rogoski, 202 N.W.2d 525 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972). “This case involves the inter- pretation of MCLA 213.366(1); MSA 8.261(6)(1) which reads: "When the petitioner is unable to agree with any person interested in any private property for the pur *595 chase thereof, the petitioner, after making a good faith written offer to purchase…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 213.366(1) — 3 cases
In Re Petition of State High. Comm'n, 178 N.W.2d 923 (Mich. 1970). “The American Oil Company, respondent-owner of one of the parcels involved, filed an answer in which it admitted the execution of said declaration of taking, but denied the validity thereof for the reason a good-faith offer to purchase the property had not been made as required…”
State High. Comm'n v. Abood, 269 N.W.2d 247 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). “MCL 213.366(1); MSA 8.261(6)(1) states in pertinent part: "When the petitioner is unable to agree with any person interested in any private property for the purchase thereof, the petitioner, after making a good faith written offer to purchase the property, may file a petition…”
City of Muskegon v. Rogoski, 202 N.W.2d 525 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972). “This case involves the inter- pretation of MCLA 213.366(1); MSA 8.261(6)(1) which reads: "When the petitioner is unable to agree with any person interested in any private property for the pur *595 chase thereof, the petitioner, after making a good faith written offer to purchase…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.