Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 24.221 (2026)
Repealed. 1976, Act 442, Eff. Apr. 13, 1977.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT OF 1969
Act 306 of 1969
24.221 Repealed. 1976, Act 442, Eff. Apr. 13, 1977.
Repealed. 1976, Act 442, Eff. Apr. 13, 1977.
Compiler's Notes:
The repealed sections pertained to public inspection of certain documents.
PopularName Notes:
Act 306PopularName Notes:
APANotes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1948–1991 · leading case: Int'l Bus. MacHines Corp. v. Dep't of Treasury, 248 N.W.2d 605 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976).
Int'l Bus. MacHines Corp. v. Dep't of Treasury, 248 N.W.2d 605 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976). “After a hearing, the circuit court found that the Revenue Division had violated §§ 21 and 23 of the APA; MCLA 24.221; MSA 3.560(121), and MCLA 24.”
Alley v. Klotz, 31 N.W.2d 816 (Mich. 1948). “The court-may take judicial notice of the mortality table set forth in the schedule to 3 Comp.”
Citizens for Better Care v. Dep't of Pub. Health, 215 N.W.2d 576 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974). “1 MCLA 24.221; MSA 3.560(121). 2 MCLA 24.222; MSA 3.”
Sellman v. Dep't of Nat. Resources, 233 N.W.2d 35 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975). “885 in that the new procedure was not formally published as a rule as required by MCLA 24.221(l)(b); MSA 3.560(121)(l)(b). Plaintiffs have made no attempt to explain, distinguish or refute the trial court’s answer to this contention.”
Baker v. State Bd. of Dentistry, 235 N.W.2d 157 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975). “Nor was MCLA 24.221; MSA 3.560(121), dealing with an agency’s obligation, inter alia, to publish and make available for public inspection promulgated rules and certain guidelines, complied with in the instant case.”
Walen v. Dep't of Corr., 473 N.W.2d 722 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991). “1801(13), were originally contained in §§ 21-23 of the apa, MCL 24.221; MSA 3.560(121) through MCL 24.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 24.221(2) — 1 case
Int'l Bus. MacHines Corp. v. Dep't of Treasury, 248 N.W.2d 605 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976). “After a hearing, the circuit court found that the Revenue Division had violated §§ 21 and 23 of the APA; MCLA 24.221; MSA 3.560(121), and MCLA 24.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 24.221(l)(b) — 1 case
Sellman v. Dep't of Nat. Resources, 233 N.W.2d 35 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975). “885 in that the new procedure was not formally published as a rule as required by MCLA 24.221(l)(b); MSA 3.560(121)(l)(b). Plaintiffs have made no attempt to explain, distinguish or refute the trial court’s answer to this contention.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.