Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 24.313 (2026)

Effective date and applicability.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT OF 1969


Act 306 of 1969


24.313 Effective date and applicability.

Sec. 113.

    This act is effective July 1, 1970, and except as to proceedings then pending applies to all agencies and agency proceedings not expressly exempted.

History: 1969, Act 306, Eff. July 1, 1970

PopularName Notes:

Act 306

PopularName Notes:

APA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1979–2023 · leading case: Martin v. Dep't of Corr., 384 N.W.2d 392 (Mich. 1986).
Martin v. Dep't of Corr., 384 N.W.2d 392 (Mich. 1986). · cites it 2× “" MCL 24.313; MSA 3.560(213). The Department of Corrections is not expressly exempted from the APA.”
Lawrence v. Dep't of Corr., 276 N.W.2d 554 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “, and has the right to judicial review, MCL 24.301; MSA 3.560(201). Presented for our determination here is the question whether a prison misconduct hearing is a "contested case” as that term is defined in § 3 (3) of the act, MCL 24.”
Boyd v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 559 N.W.2d 342 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). “Martin v Dep’t of Corrections, 424 Mich 553, 556 ; 384 NW2d 392 (1986); MCL 24.313; MSA 3.560(213). The director of the DOC is empowered under MCL 791.”
Penn v. Dep't of Corr., 298 N.W.2d 756 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “To do so may lead to further improper assertions of circuit court jurisdiction under this statute in cases arising prior to the enactment of MCL 791.”
Jordan v. Dep't of Corr., 418 N.W.2d 914 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Martin v Dep't of Corrections, 424 Mich 553, 556 ; 384 NW2d 392 (1986); MCL 24.313; MSA 3.560(213). Specified procedures must be followed when an agency subject to the APA adopts a rule.”
Shields v. Dep't of Corr., 340 N.W.2d 95 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “MCL 24.313; MSA 3.560(213). We find that the language of MCL 791.”
TRAVIS JONES v. Dep't of Corr., 460 N.W.2d 575 (Mich. Ct. App. 1990). “Martin v Dep’t of Corrections, 424 Mich 553, 556 ; 384 NW2d 392 (1986); MCL 24.313; MSA 3.560(213). In order to maintain a valid action for declaratory judgment under §64, plaintiff was required to challenge the validity or applicability of a rule which had been formally…”
League Gen. Ins. v. Catastrophic Claims Ass'n, 418 N.W.2d 708 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “On or about February 1, 1982, a group of motorcycle insurers intervened as plaintiffs in the League General action.”
Earl Booth v. Dep't of Corr. (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). “Martin v Dep’t of Corrections, 424 Mich 553, 556 ; 384 NW2d 392 (1986); MCL 24.313. The director of the DOC is empowered under MCL 791.”
Twp. of Hopkins v. State Boundary Comm'n (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “” MCL 24.313. An “Agency” is defined as a “state department, bureau, division, section, board, commission, trustee, authority or officer, created by the constitution, statute, or agency action.”
Philip M O'Halloran Md v. Sec'y of State (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “” MCL 24.313. An “agency” is defined as a “state department, bureau, division, section, board, commission, trustee, authority or officer, created by the constitution, statute, or agency action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.