Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.1331 (2026)

Acts or practices barring action on contract, action for collection of compensation, or assertion of lien; recovery of amount paid unregistered facility.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MOTOR VEHICLE SERVICE AND REPAIR ACT


Act 300 of 1974


257.1331 Acts or practices barring action on contract, action for collection of compensation, or assertion of lien; recovery of amount paid unregistered facility.

Sec. 31.

    A person who engages or attempts to engage in the business or trade of a motor vehicle repair facility or specialty or master mechanic without a registration or certificate, or engages in an act or practice in violation of this act or a rule is barred from bringing or maintaining an action at law or equity on a contract or for the collection of compensation for work performed or materials or parts provided to any other person. In addition, the person is barred from asserting a mechanic's, garageman's, or similar lien upon a motor vehicle, including the repossession of a motor vehicle. A customer is entitled to recover any amount paid to an unregistered facility for the repair of a motor vehicle belonging to that customer.

History: 1974, Act 300, Eff. Apr. 1, 1975

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1984–2019 · leading case: Campbell v. Sullins, 667 N.W.2d 887 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
Campbell v. Sullins, 667 N.W.2d 887 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 3× “Plaintiff sought recovery pursuant to MCL 257.1331 and MCL 257.1336. MCL 257.1331 entitles a customer to recover any payments he made to an “unregistered facility” for the repair of a motor vehicle.”
Hengartner v. Chet Swanson Sales, Inc, 348 N.W.2d 15 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). “The only other substantive provision in the act concerning a cause of action on the part of a private person is MCL 257.1331; MSA 9.1720(31), which provides in part: "A customer is entitled to recover any amount paid to an unregistered facility for the repair of a motor vehicle…”
Samuel Anaya v. Betten Chevrolet Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “Additionally, another portion of MVSRA, MCL 257.1331, creates a separate cause of action and limits recovery specifically to customers.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.