Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 257 / Act 300 of 1949
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.531 (2026)

Repealed. 2012, Act 204, Eff. Jan. 1, 2013.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE


Act 300 of 1949


257.531 Repealed. 2012, Act 204, Eff. Jan. 1, 2013.

    Repealed. 2012, Act 204, Eff. Jan. 1, 2013.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to certificate of self-insurance.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1979–2016 · leading case: Harris v. Vernier, 617 N.W.2d 764 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Harris v. Vernier, 617 N.W.2d 764 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “§ 257.531; MSA 9.2231, presumably with the foresight that a self-insurer may also be an employer.”
Allstate Ins. v. Elassal, 512 N.W.2d 856 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 3× “At issue is whether self-insurance, permitted under MCL 257.531; MSA 9.2231 and MCL 500.3101(4); MSA 24.”
Crawford Cnty. v. Sec'y of State, 408 N.W.2d 112 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “The source of the mini *91 mum-vehicle requirement was §531 of the financial responsibility act (fra), MCL 257.531; MSA 9.2231. The director of the Compliance and Rules Division of the Michigan Department of State reviewed and affirmed the denial of plaintiffs’ applications.”
AMY v. MIC Gen. Ins., 670 N.W.2d 228 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “4 MCL 257.531; MCL 500.3101(4). 5 State Farm Insurance Company does not participate in this appeal.”
Rooney v. Detroit Auto. Inter-Ins. Exch., 288 N.W.2d 445 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). “13009] * * *, and which is not owned by a holder of self-insurance as provided in Section 531 of * * * [the Michigan Vehicle Code; MCL 257.531; MSA 9.2231].” MCL 257.1102(d); MSA 9.”
Enter. Leasing Co. v. Sako, 590 N.W.2d 617 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “MCL 257.531; MSA 9.2231. There is nothing in the financial responsibility statute that limits the self-insured’s liability to the minimum coverage requirements of the no-fault or financial responsibility acts.”
Adam Heichel v. Geico Indem. Co. (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “Geico and State Farm insist that these well-established rules fall to the wayside when a vehicle owner such as EAN voluntarily files a certificate with the state of Michigan attesting that when responsible for doing so, it will provide “security equivalent to that afforded by a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.