Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.601c (2026)

Moving violation causing injury or death to person operating implement of husbandry on highway.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE


Act 300 of 1949


257.601c Moving violation causing injury or death to person operating implement of husbandry on highway.

Sec. 601c.

    (1) A person who commits a moving violation that has criminal penalties and as a result causes injury to a person operating an implement of husbandry on a highway in compliance with this act is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 1 year or a fine of not more than $1,000.00, or both.

    (2) A person who commits a moving violation that has criminal penalties and as a result causes death to a person operating an implement of husbandry on a highway in compliance with this act is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not more than $7,500.00, or both.

    (3) As used in this section, "moving violation" means an act or omission prohibited under this act or a local ordinance substantially corresponding to this act that occurs while a person is operating a motor vehicle, and for which the person is subject to a fine.

History: Add. 2001, Act 103, Eff. Oct. 1, 2001

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2007–2007 · leading case: Dawson v. Sec'y of State, 739 N.W.2d 339 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007).
Dawson v. Sec'y of State, 739 N.W.2d 339 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “601b(2) and (3), MCL 257.601c(1) and (2), and MCL 257.653a(3) and (4)].”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.601c(1) — 1 case
Dawson v. Sec'y of State, 739 N.W.2d 339 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007). “601b(2) and (3), MCL 257.601c(1) and (2), and MCL 257.653a(3) and (4)].”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.601c(l) — 1 case
Dawson v. Sec'y of State, 739 N.W.2d 339 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007). “601b(2) and (3), MCL 257.601c(1) and (2), and MCL 257.653a(3) and (4)].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.