Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625 (2026)

Operating motor vehicle while intoxicated; "operating while intoxicated" defined; operating motor vehicle when visibly impaired; penalties for causing death or serious impairment of a body function; operation of motor vehicle by person less than 21 years of age; "any bodily alcohol content" defined; requirements; controlled substance; costs; enhanced sentence; guilty plea or nolo contendere; establishment of prior conviction; special verdict; public record; burden of proving religious service or ceremony; ignition interlock device; definitions; prior conviction; violations arising out of same transaction.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE


Act 300 of 1949


257.625 Operating motor vehicle while intoxicated; "operating while intoxicated" defined; operating motor vehicle when visibly impaired; penalties for causing death or serious impairment of a body function; operation of motor vehicle by person less than 21 years of age; "any bodily alcohol content" defined; requirements; controlled substance; costs; enhanced sentence; guilty plea or nolo contendere; establishment of prior conviction; special verdict; public record; burden of proving religious service or ceremony; ignition interlock device; definitions; prior conviction; violations arising out of same transaction.

Sec. 625.

    (1) A person, whether licensed or not, shall not operate a vehicle on a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles, within this state if the person is operating while intoxicated. As used in this section, "operating while intoxicated" means any of the following:

    (a) The person is under the influence of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance.

    (b) The person has an alcohol content of 0.08 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine or, beginning 5 years after the state treasurer publishes a certification under subsection (28), the person has an alcohol content of 0.10 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine.

    (c) The person has an alcohol content of 0.17 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine.

    (2) The owner of a vehicle or a person in charge or in control of a vehicle shall not authorize or knowingly permit the vehicle to be operated on a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of motor vehicles, within this state by a person if any of the following apply:

    (a) The person is under the influence of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, other intoxicating substance, or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance.

    (b) The person has an alcohol content of 0.08 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine or, beginning 5 years after the state treasurer publishes a certification under subsection (28), the person has an alcohol content of 0.10 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine.

    (c) The person's ability to operate the motor vehicle is visibly impaired due to the consumption of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance, or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance.

    (3) A person, whether licensed or not, shall not operate a vehicle on a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles, within this state when, due to the consumption of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance, or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance, the person's ability to operate the vehicle is visibly impaired. If a person is charged with violating subsection (1), a finding of guilty under this subsection may be rendered.

    (4) A person, whether licensed or not, who operates a motor vehicle in violation of subsection (1), (3), or (8) and by the operation of that motor vehicle causes the death of another person is guilty of a crime as follows:

    (a) Except as provided in subdivisions (b) and (c), the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not less than $2,500.00 or more than $10,000.00, or both. The judgment of sentence may impose the sanction permitted under section 625n. If the vehicle is not ordered to be forfeited under section 625n, the court shall order vehicle immobilization under section 904d in the judgment of sentence.

    (b) If the violation occurs while the person has an alcohol content of 0.17 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine, and within 7 years of a prior conviction, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not less than $2,500.00 or more than $10,000.00, or both. The judgment of sentence may impose the sanction permitted under section 625n. If the vehicle is not ordered to be forfeited under section 625n, the court shall order vehicle immobilization under section 904d in the judgment of sentence.

    (c) If, at the time of the violation, the person is operating a motor vehicle in a manner proscribed under section 653a and causes the death of a police officer, firefighter, or other emergency response personnel, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not less than $2,500.00 or more than $10,000.00, or both. This subdivision applies regardless of whether the person is charged with the violation of section 653a. The judgment of sentence may impose the sanction permitted under section 625n. If the vehicle is not ordered to be forfeited under section 625n, the court shall order vehicle immobilization under section 904d in the judgment of sentence.

    (5) A person, whether licensed or not, who operates a motor vehicle in violation of subsection (1), (3), or (8) and by the operation of that motor vehicle causes a serious impairment of a body function of another person is guilty of a crime as follows:

    (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine of not less than $1,000.00 or more than $5,000.00, or both. The judgment of sentence may impose the sanction permitted under section 625n. If the vehicle is not ordered to be forfeited under section 625n, the court shall order vehicle immobilization under section 904d in the judgment of sentence.

    (b) If the violation occurs while the person has an alcohol content of 0.17 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine, and within 7 years of a prior conviction, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine of not less than $1,000.00 or more than $5,000.00, or both. The judgment of sentence may impose the sanction permitted under section 625n. If the vehicle is not ordered to be forfeited under section 625n, the court shall order vehicle immobilization under section 904d in the judgment of sentence.

    (6) A person who is less than 21 years of age, whether licensed or not, shall not operate a vehicle on a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles, within this state if the person has any bodily alcohol content. As used in this subsection, "any bodily alcohol content" means either of the following:

    (a) An alcohol content of 0.02 grams or more but less than 0.08 grams per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine or, beginning 5 years after the state treasurer publishes a certification under subsection (28), the person has an alcohol content of 0.02 grams or more but less than 0.10 grams per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine.

    (b) Any presence of alcohol within a person's body resulting from the consumption of alcoholic liquor, other than consumption of alcoholic liquor as a part of a generally recognized religious service or ceremony.

    (7) A person, whether licensed or not, is subject to the following requirements:

    (a) He or she shall not operate a vehicle in violation of subsection (1), (3), (4), (5), or (8) while another person who is less than 16 years of age is occupying the vehicle. A person who violates this subdivision is guilty of a crime punishable as follows:

    (i) Except as provided in subparagraph (ii), a person who violates this subdivision is guilty of a misdemeanor and must be sentenced to pay a fine of not less than $200.00 or more than $1,000.00 and to 1 or more of the following:

    (A) Imprisonment for not more than 1 year.

    (B) Community service for not less than 30 days or more than 90 days.

    (ii) If the violation occurs within 7 years of a prior conviction or after 2 or more prior convictions, regardless of the number of years that have elapsed since any prior conviction, a person who violates this subdivision is guilty of a felony and must be sentenced to pay a fine of not less than $500.00 or more than $5,000.00 and to either of the following:

    (A) Imprisonment under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections for not less than 1 year or more than 5 years.

    (B) Probation with imprisonment in the county jail for not less than 30 days or more than 1 year and community service for not less than 60 days or more than 180 days. Not less than 48 hours of this imprisonment must be served consecutively.

    (iii) A term of imprisonment imposed under subparagraph (ii)(A) or (B) must not be suspended unless the defendant agrees to participate in a specialty court program and successfully completes the program.

    (b) He or she shall not operate a vehicle in violation of subsection (6) while another person who is less than 16 years of age is occupying the vehicle. A person who violates this subdivision is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable as follows:

    (i) Except as provided in subparagraph (ii), a person who violates this subdivision may be sentenced to 1 or more of the following:

    (A) Community service for not more than 60 days.

    (B) A fine of not more than $500.00.

    (C) Imprisonment for not more than 93 days.

    (ii) If the violation occurs within 7 years of a prior conviction or after 2 or more prior convictions, regardless of the number of years that have elapsed since any prior conviction, a person who violates this subdivision must be sentenced to pay a fine of not less than $200.00 or more than $1,000.00 and to 1 or more of the following:

    (A) Imprisonment for not less than 5 days or more than 1 year. This term of imprisonment must not be suspended unless the defendant agrees to participate in a specialty court program and successfully completes the program.

    (B) Community service for not less than 30 days or more than 90 days.

    (c) In the judgment of sentence under subdivision (a)(i) or (b)(i), the court may, unless the vehicle is ordered to be forfeited under section 625n, order vehicle immobilization as provided in section 904d. In the judgment of sentence under subdivision (a)(ii) or (b)(ii), the court shall, unless the vehicle is ordered to be forfeited under section 625n, order vehicle immobilization as provided in section 904d.

    (d) This subsection does not prohibit a person from being charged with, convicted of, or punished for a violation of subsection (4) or (5) that is committed by the person while violating this subsection. However, points shall not be assessed under section 320a for both a violation of subsection (4) or (5) and a violation of this subsection for conduct arising out of the same transaction.

    (8) A person, whether licensed or not, shall not operate a vehicle on a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles, within this state if the person has in his or her body any amount of a controlled substance listed in schedule 1 under section 7212 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.7212, or a rule promulgated under that section, or of a controlled substance described in section 7214(a)(iv) of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.7214.

    (9) If a person is convicted of violating subsection (1) or (8), all of the following apply:

    (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivisions (b) and (c), the person is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by 1 or more of the following:

    (i) Community service for not more than 360 hours.

    (ii) Imprisonment for not more than 93 days, or, if the person is convicted of violating subsection (1)(c), imprisonment for not more than 180 days.

    (iii) A fine of not less than $100.00 or more than $500.00, or, if the person is guilty of violating subsection (1)(c), a fine of not less than $200.00 or more than $700.00.

    (b) If the violation occurs within 7 years of a prior conviction, the person must be sentenced to pay a fine of not less than $200.00 or more than $1,000.00 and 1 or more of the following:

    (i) Imprisonment for not less than 5 days or more than 1 year.

    (ii) Community service for not less than 30 days or more than 90 days.

    (c) If the violation occurs after 2 or more prior convictions, regardless of the number of years that have elapsed since any prior conviction, the person is guilty of a felony and must be sentenced to pay a fine of not less than $500.00 or more than $5,000.00 and to either of the following:

    (i) Imprisonment under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections for not less than 1 year or more than 5 years.

    (ii) Probation with imprisonment in the county jail for not less than 30 days or more than 1 year and community service for not less than 60 days or more than 180 days. Not less than 48 hours of the imprisonment imposed under this subparagraph must be served consecutively.

    (d) A term of imprisonment imposed under subdivision (b) or (c) must not be suspended unless the defendant agrees to participate in a specialty court program and successfully completes the program.

    (e) In the judgment of sentence under subdivision (a), the court may order vehicle immobilization as provided in section 904d. In the judgment of sentence under subdivision (b) or (c), the court shall, unless the vehicle is ordered to be forfeited under section 625n, order vehicle immobilization as provided in section 904d.

    (f) In the judgment of sentence under subdivision (b) or (c), the court may impose the sanction permitted under section 625n.

    (10) A person who is convicted of violating subsection (2) is guilty of a crime as follows:

    (a) Except as provided in subdivisions (b) and (c), a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 93 days or a fine of not less than $100.00 or more than $500.00, or both.

    (b) If the person operating the motor vehicle violated subsection (4), a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine of not less than $1,500.00 or more than $10,000.00, or both.

    (c) If the person operating the motor vehicle violated subsection (5), a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 2 years or a fine of not less than $1,000.00 or more than $5,000.00, or both.

    (11) If a person is convicted of violating subsection (3), all of the following apply:

    (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivisions (b) and (c), the person is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by 1 or more of the following:

    (i) Community service for not more than 360 hours.

    (ii) Imprisonment for not more than 93 days.

    (iii) A fine of not more than $300.00.

    (b) If the violation occurs within 7 years of 1 prior conviction, the person must be sentenced to pay a fine of not less than $200.00 or more than $1,000.00, and 1 or more of the following:

    (i) Imprisonment for not less than 5 days or more than 1 year.

    (ii) Community service for not less than 30 days or more than 90 days.

    (c) If the violation occurs after 2 or more prior convictions, regardless of the number of years that have elapsed since any prior conviction, the person is guilty of a felony and must be sentenced to pay a fine of not less than $500.00 or more than $5,000.00 and either of the following:

    (i) Imprisonment under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections for not less than 1 year or more than 5 years.

    (ii) Probation with imprisonment in the county jail for not less than 30 days or more than 1 year and community service for not less than 60 days or more than 180 days. Not less than 48 hours of the imprisonment imposed under this subparagraph must be served consecutively.

    (d) A term of imprisonment imposed under subdivision (b) or (c) must not be suspended unless the defendant agrees to participate in a specialty court program and successfully completes the program.

    (e) In the judgment of sentence under subdivision (a), the court may order vehicle immobilization as provided in section 904d. In the judgment of sentence under subdivision (b) or (c), the court shall, unless the vehicle is ordered to be forfeited under section 625n, order vehicle immobilization as provided in section 904d.

    (f) In the judgment of sentence under subdivision (b) or (c), the court may impose the sanction permitted under section 625n.

    (12) If a person is convicted of violating subsection (6), all of the following apply:

    (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (b), the person is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by 1 or both of the following:

    (i) Community service for not more than 360 hours.

    (ii) A fine of not more than $250.00.

    (b) If the violation occurs within 7 years of 1 or more prior convictions, the person may be sentenced to 1 or more of the following:

    (i) Community service for not more than 60 days.

    (ii) A fine of not more than $500.00.

    (iii) Imprisonment for not more than 93 days.

    (13) In addition to imposing the sanctions prescribed under this section, the court may order the person to pay the costs of the prosecution under the code of criminal procedure, 1927 PA 175, MCL 760.1 to 777.69.

    (14) A person sentenced to perform community service under this section must not receive compensation and must reimburse the state or appropriate local unit of government for the cost of supervision incurred by the state or local unit of government as a result of the person's activities in that service.

    (15) If the prosecuting attorney intends to seek an enhanced sentence under this section or a sanction under section 625n based on the defendant having 1 or more prior convictions, the prosecuting attorney shall include on the complaint and information, or an amended complaint and information, filed in district court, circuit court, municipal court, or family division of circuit court, a statement listing the defendant's prior convictions.

    (16) If a person is charged with a violation of subsection (1), (3), (4), (5), (7), or (8) or section 625m, the court shall not permit the defendant to enter a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a charge of violating subsection (6) in exchange for dismissal of the original charge. This subsection does not prohibit the court from dismissing the charge on the prosecuting attorney's motion.

    (17) A prior conviction must be established at sentencing by 1 or more of the following:

    (a) A copy of a judgment of conviction.

    (b) An abstract of conviction.

    (c) A transcript of a prior trial or a plea-taking or sentencing proceeding.

    (d) A copy of a court register of actions.

    (e) A copy of the defendant's driving record.

    (f) Information contained in a presentence report.

    (g) An admission by the defendant.

    (18) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (20), if a person is charged with operating a vehicle while under the influence of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance in violation of subsection (1) or a local ordinance substantially corresponding to subsection (1), the court shall require the jury to return a special verdict in the form of a written finding or, if the court convicts the person without a jury or accepts a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, the court shall make a finding as to whether the person was under the influence of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance at the time of the violation.

    (19) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (20), if a person is charged with operating a vehicle while his or her ability to operate the vehicle was visibly impaired due to his or her consumption of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance in violation of subsection (3) or a local ordinance substantially corresponding to subsection (3), the court shall require the jury to return a special verdict in the form of a written finding or, if the court convicts the person without a jury or accepts a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, the court shall make a finding as to whether, due to the consumption of a controlled substance or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance, the person's ability to operate a motor vehicle was visibly impaired at the time of the violation.

    (20) A special verdict described in subsections (18) and (19) is not required if a jury is instructed to make a finding solely as to either of the following:

    (a) Whether the defendant was under the influence of a controlled substance or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance at the time of the violation.

    (b) Whether the defendant was visibly impaired due to his or her consumption of a controlled substance or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance at the time of the violation.

    (21) If a jury or court finds under subsection (18), (19), or (20) that the defendant operated a motor vehicle under the influence of or while impaired due to the consumption of a controlled substance or a combination of a controlled substance, an alcoholic liquor, or other intoxicating substance, the court shall do both of the following:

    (a) Report the finding to the secretary of state.

    (b) On a form or forms prescribed by the state court administrator, forward to the department of state police a record that specifies the penalties imposed by the court, including any term of imprisonment, and any sanction imposed under section 625n or 904d.

    (22) Except as otherwise provided by law, a record described in subsection (21)(b) is a public record and the department of state police shall retain the information contained on that record for not less than 7 years.

    (23) In a prosecution for a violation of subsection (6), the defendant bears the burden of proving that the consumption of alcoholic liquor was a part of a generally recognized religious service or ceremony by a preponderance of the evidence.

    (24) The court may order as a condition of probation that a person convicted of violating subsection (1) or (8), or a local ordinance substantially corresponding to subsection (1) or (8), shall not operate a motor vehicle unless that vehicle is equipped with an ignition interlock device approved, certified, and installed as required under sections 625k and 625l.

    (25) As used in this section:

    (a) "Intoxicating substance" means any substance, preparation, or a combination of substances and preparations other than alcohol or a controlled substance, that is either of the following:

    (i) Recognized as a drug in any of the following publications or their supplements:

    (A) The official United States Pharmacopoeia.

    (B) The official Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States.

    (C) The official National Formulary.

    (ii) A substance, other than food, taken into a person's body, including, but not limited to, vapors or fumes, that is used in a manner or for a purpose for which it was not intended, and that may result in a condition of intoxication.

    (b) "Prior conviction" means a conviction for any of the following, whether under a law of this state, a local ordinance substantially corresponding to a law of this state, a law of the United States substantially corresponding to a law of this state, or a law of another state substantially corresponding to a law of this state, subject to subsection (27):

    (i) Except as provided in subsection (26), a violation or attempted violation of any of the following:

    (A) This section, except a violation of subsection (2), or a violation of any prior enactment of this section in which the defendant operated a vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating or alcoholic liquor or a controlled substance, or a combination of intoxicating or alcoholic liquor and a controlled substance, or while visibly impaired, or with an unlawful bodily alcohol content.

    (B) Section 625m.

    (C) Former section 625b.

    (ii) Negligent homicide, manslaughter, or murder resulting from the operation of a vehicle or an attempt to commit any of those crimes.

    (iii) Section 601d or 626(3) or (4).

    (26) Except for purposes of the enhancement described in subsection (12)(b), only 1 violation or attempted violation of subsection (6), a local ordinance substantially corresponding to subsection (6), or a law of another state substantially corresponding to subsection (6) may be used as a prior conviction.

    (27) If 2 or more convictions described in subsection (25) are convictions for violations arising out of the same transaction, only 1 conviction must be used to determine if the person has a prior conviction.

    (28) Not later than 30 days after this state no longer receives annual federal highway construction funding conditioned on compliance with a national blood alcohol limit, the state treasurer shall certify that fact. The state treasurer shall publish a certification under this subsection on the department of treasury's website.

    

    

History: 1949, Act 300, Eff. Sept. 23, 1949 ;-- Am. 1951, Act 270, Eff. Sept. 28, 1951 ;-- Am. 1954, Act 10, Eff. Aug. 13, 1954 ;-- Am. 1956, Act 34, Eff. Aug. 11, 1956 ;-- Am. 1958, Act 113, Eff. Sept. 13, 1958 ;-- Am. 1976, Act 285, Eff. Apr. 1, 1977 ;-- Am. 1978, Act 57, Imd. Eff. Mar. 10, 1978 ;-- Am. 1978, Act 391, Eff. Jan. 15, 1979 ;-- Am. 1980, Act 515, Eff. Apr. 1, 1981 ;-- Am. 1982, Act 309, Eff. Mar. 30, 1983 ;-- Am. 1987, Act 109, Eff. Mar. 30, 1988 ;-- Am. 1991, Act 98, Eff. Jan. 1, 1992 ;-- Am. 1993, Act 359, Eff. Sept. 1, 1994 ;-- Am. 1994, Act 211, Eff. Nov. 1, 1994 ;-- Am. 1994, Act 448, Eff. May 1, 1995 ;-- Am. 1994, Act 449, Eff. May 1, 1995 ;-- Am. 1996, Act 491, Eff. Apr. 1, 1997 ;-- Am. 1998, Act 350, Eff. Oct. 1, 1999 ;-- Am. 1999, Act 73, Eff. Oct. 1, 1999 ;-- Am. 2000, Act 77, Eff. Oct. 1, 2000 ;-- Am. 2000, Act 460, Eff. Mar. 28, 2001 ;-- Am. 2003, Act 61, Eff. Sept. 30, 2003 ;-- Am. 2004, Act 62, Eff. May 3, 2004 ;-- Am. 2006, Act 564, Imd. Eff. Jan. 3, 2007 ;-- Am. 2008, Act 341, Eff. Jan. 1, 2009 ;-- Am. 2008, Act 462, Eff. Oct. 31, 2010 ;-- Am. 2008, Act 463, Eff. Oct. 31, 2010 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 543, Eff. Mar. 31, 2013 ;-- Am. 2013, Act 23, Imd. Eff. May 9, 2013 ;-- Am. 2014, Act 219, Eff. Sept. 24, 2014 ;-- Am. 2017, Act 153, Eff. Feb. 6, 2018 ;-- Am. 2020, Act 383, Eff. Mar. 24, 2021 ;-- Am. 2021, Act 80, Eff. Nov. 21, 2021 ;-- Am. 2021, Act 85, Imd. Eff. Sept. 24, 2021

Compiler's Notes:

    Section 2 of Act 309 of 1982 provides: “All proceedings pending and all rights and liabilities existing, acquired, or incurred at the time this amendatory act takes effect are saved and may be consummated according to the law in force when they are commenced. This amendatory act shall not be construed to affect any prosecution pending or initiated before the effective date of this amendatory act, or initiated after the effective date of this amendatory act for an offense committed before that effective date.”

PopularName Notes:

Heidi's Law
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 874 cases (204 in the last 5 years), 1957–2026 · leading case: People v. Feezel, 783 N.W.2d 67 (Mich. 2010).
People v. Feezel, 783 N.W.2d 67 (Mich. 2010). · cites it 68× “" [33] It is noteworthy that the Legislature has reenacted MCL 257.625 four times by amending it since this Court decided Derror .”
People v. Schaefer, 703 N.W.2d 774 (Mich. 2005). · cites it 36× “" [47] We hold that the prosecution, in proving OUIL causing death, must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that (1) the defendant was operating his or her motor vehicle in violation of MCL 257.625(1), (3), or (8); (2) the defendant voluntarily decided to drive, knowing that he…”
People v. Miller, 869 N.W.2d 204 (Mich. 2015). · cites it 38× “ANALYSIS AND APPLICATION Subsections (1) through (8) of MCL 257.625 establish different categories of operating while intoxicated offenses.”
People v. Callon, 662 N.W.2d 501 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 19× “First, defendant’s reliance on People v Bewersdorf, 438 Mich 55, 68 ; 475 NW2d 231 (1991), is misplaced because in that case our Supreme Court addressed MCL 257.625 as it existed before its amendment by 1991 PA 98 , which made the existence of prior convictions only part of a…”
People of Michigan v. Gregory Scott Mikulen, 919 N.W.2d 454 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 19× “625 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (1) A person, whether licensed or not, shall not operate a vehicle upon a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles, within…”
People v. Lardie, 551 N.W.2d 656 (Mich. 1996). · cites it 48× “§ 257.625; M.S.A. § 9.2325. Rules of statutory construction dictate that this fourth subsection be construed as consistently as possible with the other subsections of M.”
People v. Anstey, 719 N.W.2d 579 (Mich. 2006). · cites it 16× “Defendant herein was arrested for operating a vehicle while intoxicated, a violation of MCL 257.625. At the arresting officer's request, defendant agreed to take a chemical breath test.”
People v. Bewersdorf, 475 N.W.2d 231 (Mich. 1991). · cites it 30× “[17] Our grant order limited the issues to (1) whether a third or subsequent conviction for violating MCL 257.625; MSA 9.2325 may serve as the current felony for purposes of a second-felony habitual offender charge, (2) whether a third or subsequent conviction for violating MCL…”
People v. Sadows, 768 N.W.2d 93 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 23× “Because MCL 257.625, as amended by 2006 PA 564 , does not violate the prohibition against ex post facto laws, and because it does not deny defendants their rights to equal protection and due process, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.”
Bloomfield Twp. v. Kane, 839 N.W.2d 505 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 21× “MCL 257.625 addresses offenses involving the operation of a vehicle while under the influence and provides in relevant part: (1) A person, whether licensed or not, shall not operate a vehicle upon a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to…”
People v. Hyde, 775 N.W.2d 833 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 8× “icles, within this state is considered to have given consent to chemical tests of his or her blood, breath, or urine for the purpose of determining the amount of alcohol or presence of a controlled substance or both in his or her blood or urine or the amount of alcohol in his or…”
People v. Rogers, 475 N.W.2d 717 (Mich. 1991). · cites it 28× “The Court of Appeals reversed in an unpublished opinion per curiam, holding that a person who is intoxicated or has an impermissible blood-alcohol content while operating a snowmobile upon a highway or other place open to the general public may be prosecuted as an OUIL offender…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(1) — 269 cases
People v. Miller, 869 N.W.2d 204 (Mich. 2015). “ANALYSIS AND APPLICATION Subsections (1) through (8) of MCL 257.625 establish different categories of operating while intoxicated offenses.”
People v. Hyde, 775 N.W.2d 833 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “icles, within this state is considered to have given consent to chemical tests of his or her blood, breath, or urine for the purpose of determining the amount of alcohol or presence of a controlled substance or both in his or her blood or urine or the amount of alcohol in his or…”
People v. Schaefer, 703 N.W.2d 774 (Mich. 2005). “" [47] We hold that the prosecution, in proving OUIL causing death, must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that (1) the defendant was operating his or her motor vehicle in violation of MCL 257.625(1), (3), or (8); (2) the defendant voluntarily decided to drive, knowing that he…”
Bloomfield Twp. v. Kane, 839 N.W.2d 505 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “MCL 257.625 addresses offenses involving the operation of a vehicle while under the influence and provides in relevant part: (1) A person, whether licensed or not, shall not operate a vehicle upon a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to…”
People v. Feezel, 783 N.W.2d 67 (Mich. 2010). “" [33] It is noteworthy that the Legislature has reenacted MCL 257.625 four times by amending it since this Court decided Derror .”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(1)(9)(c) — 1 case
People of Michigan v. Braden Lee Reid (Mich. Ct. App. 2021).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(1)(C) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(1)(a) — 72 cases
People v. Anstey, 719 N.W.2d 579 (Mich. 2006). “Defendant herein was arrested for operating a vehicle while intoxicated, a violation of MCL 257.625. At the arresting officer's request, defendant agreed to take a chemical breath test.”
People of Michigan v. Gregory Scott Mikulen, 919 N.W.2d 454 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “625 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (1) A person, whether licensed or not, shall not operate a vehicle upon a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles, within…”
People v. Hyde, 775 N.W.2d 833 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “icles, within this state is considered to have given consent to chemical tests of his or her blood, breath, or urine for the purpose of determining the amount of alcohol or presence of a controlled substance or both in his or her blood or urine or the amount of alcohol in his or…”
People v. Bergman, 879 N.W.2d 278 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
People v. Koon, 28 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 141 (Mich. 2013).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(1)(b) — 57 cases
People of Michigan v. Gregory Scott Mikulen, 919 N.W.2d 454 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “625 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (1) A person, whether licensed or not, shall not operate a vehicle upon a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles, within…”
In Re Noecker, 691 N.W.2d 440 (Mich. 2005).
People v. Hyde, 775 N.W.2d 833 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “icles, within this state is considered to have given consent to chemical tests of his or her blood, breath, or urine for the purpose of determining the amount of alcohol or presence of a controlled substance or both in his or her blood or urine or the amount of alcohol in his or…”
People v. Borchard-Ruhland, 597 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. 1999).
Reed v. Breton, 718 N.W.2d 770 (Mich. 2006).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(1)(c) — 23 cases
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(10) — 2 cases
People v. Callon, 662 N.W.2d 501 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “First, defendant’s reliance on People v Bewersdorf, 438 Mich 55, 68 ; 475 NW2d 231 (1991), is misplaced because in that case our Supreme Court addressed MCL 257.625 as it existed before its amendment by 1991 PA 98 , which made the existence of prior convictions only part of a…”
People v. Weatherholt, 533 N.W.2d 24 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(10)(c) — 4 cases
People v. Hamilton, 638 N.W.2d 92 (Mich. 2002).
People v. Fett, 666 N.W.2d 676 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
People v. Fett, 684 N.W.2d 369 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004).
People v. Fett, 684 N.W.2d 369 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(11) — 3 cases
People v. Sadows, 768 N.W.2d 93 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “Because MCL 257.625, as amended by 2006 PA 564 , does not violate the prohibition against ex post facto laws, and because it does not deny defendants their rights to equal protection and due process, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.”
People v. Weatherholt, 543 N.W.2d 34 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995).
20221229_C360206_53_360206.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2022).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(11)(c) — 6 cases
20221229_C360206_53_360206.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2022).
20230112_C358801_39_358801.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(11)(c)(i) — 1 case
People v. Siterlet, 829 N.W.2d 285 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(12) — 1 case
People v. Zinn, 551 N.W.2d 704 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(12)(a) — 2 cases
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(13) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(14) — 2 cases
People v. Reichenbach, 587 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. 1998).
People v. St John, 585 N.W.2d 849 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(16) — 3 cases
People v. Callon, 662 N.W.2d 501 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “First, defendant’s reliance on People v Bewersdorf, 438 Mich 55, 68 ; 475 NW2d 231 (1991), is misplaced because in that case our Supreme Court addressed MCL 257.625 as it existed before its amendment by 1991 PA 98 , which made the existence of prior convictions only part of a…”
People v. Reichenbach, 587 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. 1998).
People v. Bulger, 804 N.W.2d 341 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(16)(a) — 1 case
People v. Callon, 662 N.W.2d 501 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “First, defendant’s reliance on People v Bewersdorf, 438 Mich 55, 68 ; 475 NW2d 231 (1991), is misplaced because in that case our Supreme Court addressed MCL 257.625 as it existed before its amendment by 1991 PA 98 , which made the existence of prior convictions only part of a…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(16)(b) — 1 case
People v. Callon, 662 N.W.2d 501 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “First, defendant’s reliance on People v Bewersdorf, 438 Mich 55, 68 ; 475 NW2d 231 (1991), is misplaced because in that case our Supreme Court addressed MCL 257.625 as it existed before its amendment by 1991 PA 98 , which made the existence of prior convictions only part of a…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(16)(c) — 1 case
People v. Callon, 662 N.W.2d 501 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “First, defendant’s reliance on People v Bewersdorf, 438 Mich 55, 68 ; 475 NW2d 231 (1991), is misplaced because in that case our Supreme Court addressed MCL 257.625 as it existed before its amendment by 1991 PA 98 , which made the existence of prior convictions only part of a…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(17) — 1 case
People v. Burton, 651 N.W.2d 143 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(18) — 1 case
People v. Koon, 28 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 141 (Mich. 2013).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(2) — 14 cases
Howe v. Detroit Free Press, Inc, 487 N.W.2d 374 (Mich. 1992).
People v. Rogers, 475 N.W.2d 717 (Mich. 1991). “The Court of Appeals reversed in an unpublished opinion per curiam, holding that a person who is intoxicated or has an impermissible blood-alcohol content while operating a snowmobile upon a highway or other place open to the general public may be prosecuted as an OUIL offender…”
Adkins v. Home Life Ins., 372 N.W.2d 671 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985).
Miller v. Auto-All. Int'l, Inc., 953 F. Supp. 172 (E.D. Mich. 1997).
People v. Orweller, 494 N.W.2d 753 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(20)(a) — 1 case
People v. Wyrick, 695 N.W.2d 555 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(20)(b) — 1 case
People v. Wyrick, 695 N.W.2d 555 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(21)(a) — 2 cases
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(23) — 5 cases
People v. Callon, 662 N.W.2d 501 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “First, defendant’s reliance on People v Bewersdorf, 438 Mich 55, 68 ; 475 NW2d 231 (1991), is misplaced because in that case our Supreme Court addressed MCL 257.625 as it existed before its amendment by 1991 PA 98 , which made the existence of prior convictions only part of a…”
People v. Haynes, 664 N.W.2d 225 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
People v. Clement, 657 N.W.2d 172 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
People v. Wolfe, 651 N.W.2d 72 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002).
People v. Fett, 666 N.W.2d 676 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(23)(a) — 2 cases
People v. Tucker, 879 N.W.2d 906 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
People v. Wolfe, 651 N.W.2d 72 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(25) — 3 cases
People v. Miller, 869 N.W.2d 204 (Mich. 2015). “ANALYSIS AND APPLICATION Subsections (1) through (8) of MCL 257.625 establish different categories of operating while intoxicated offenses.”
People v. Bulger, 804 N.W.2d 341 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(25)(a)(i) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(25)(b) — 2 cases
People v. Miller, 869 N.W.2d 204 (Mich. 2015). “ANALYSIS AND APPLICATION Subsections (1) through (8) of MCL 257.625 establish different categories of operating while intoxicated offenses.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(25)(b)(i)(A) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(26) — 1 case
People v. Bulger, 804 N.W.2d 341 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(27) — 1 case
People v. Miller, 869 N.W.2d 204 (Mich. 2015). “ANALYSIS AND APPLICATION Subsections (1) through (8) of MCL 257.625 establish different categories of operating while intoxicated offenses.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(3) — 59 cases
People of Michigan v. Gregory Scott Mikulen, 919 N.W.2d 454 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “625 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (1) A person, whether licensed or not, shall not operate a vehicle upon a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles, within…”
People v. Callon, 662 N.W.2d 501 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “First, defendant’s reliance on People v Bewersdorf, 438 Mich 55, 68 ; 475 NW2d 231 (1991), is misplaced because in that case our Supreme Court addressed MCL 257.625 as it existed before its amendment by 1991 PA 98 , which made the existence of prior convictions only part of a…”
Dawson v. Sec'y of State, 739 N.W.2d 339 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007).
Christopher Bailey v. City of Howell, 643 F. App'x 589 (6th Cir. 2016).
People v. Lucey, 787 N.W.2d 133 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(3)(a) — 2 cases
People v. Tabar, 347 N.W.2d 458 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984).
People of Michigan v. Michael Allen (Mich. Ct. App. 2016).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(3)(b) — 1 case
People v. Tabar, 347 N.W.2d 458 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(4) — 125 cases
People v. Feezel, 783 N.W.2d 67 (Mich. 2010). “" [33] It is noteworthy that the Legislature has reenacted MCL 257.625 four times by amending it since this Court decided Derror .”
People v. Schaefer, 703 N.W.2d 774 (Mich. 2005). “" [47] We hold that the prosecution, in proving OUIL causing death, must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that (1) the defendant was operating his or her motor vehicle in violation of MCL 257.625(1), (3), or (8); (2) the defendant voluntarily decided to drive, knowing that he…”
People v. Lardie, 551 N.W.2d 656 (Mich. 1996). “§ 257.625; M.S.A. § 9.2325. Rules of statutory construction dictate that this fourth subsection be construed as consistently as possible with the other subsections of M.”
People v. Goecke, 579 N.W.2d 868 (Mich. 1998).
People v. Bergman, 879 N.W.2d 278 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(4)(5) — 1 case
People v. Derror, 704 N.W.2d 704 (Mich. 2005).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(4)(a) — 36 cases
People v. Bulger, 804 N.W.2d 341 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(4)(b) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(5) — 71 cases
People v. Miller, 869 N.W.2d 204 (Mich. 2015). “ANALYSIS AND APPLICATION Subsections (1) through (8) of MCL 257.625 establish different categories of operating while intoxicated offenses.”
People v. Borchard-Ruhland, 597 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. 1999).
People v. Rogers, 475 N.W.2d 717 (Mich. 1991). “The Court of Appeals reversed in an unpublished opinion per curiam, holding that a person who is intoxicated or has an impermissible blood-alcohol content while operating a snowmobile upon a highway or other place open to the general public may be prosecuted as an OUIL offender…”
People v. Derror, 706 N.W.2d 451 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005).
People v. Bergman, 879 N.W.2d 278 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(5)(a) — 26 cases
20230126_C360594_45_360594.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2023).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(5)(b) — 2 cases
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(6) — 53 cases
People v. Bewersdorf, 475 N.W.2d 231 (Mich. 1991). “[17] Our grant order limited the issues to (1) whether a third or subsequent conviction for violating MCL 257.625; MSA 9.2325 may serve as the current felony for purposes of a second-felony habitual offender charge, (2) whether a third or subsequent conviction for violating MCL…”
People v Doyle, 545 N.W.2d 627 (Mich. 1996).
People v. Rutledge, 645 N.W.2d 333 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002).
People v. Haynes, 664 N.W.2d 225 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
People v. Stewart, 555 N.W.2d 715 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(6)(D) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(6)(a) — 3 cases
People v. Wood, 538 N.W.2d 351 (Mich. 1995).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(6)(b) — 5 cases
People v. Rutledge, 645 N.W.2d 333 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002).
People v. Hurn, 518 N.W.2d 502 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994).
People v. Fish, 525 N.W.2d 467 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994).
People v. Vezina, 550 N.W.2d 613 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(6)(d) — 10 cases
People v Doyle, 545 N.W.2d 627 (Mich. 1996).
People v. Jacobsen, 517 N.W.2d 323 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994).
People v. Guiles, 500 N.W.2d 757 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993).
People v. Weatherholt, 543 N.W.2d 34 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995).
People v. Fish, 525 N.W.2d 467 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(6)(f) — 1 case
People v. Callon, 662 N.W.2d 501 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “First, defendant’s reliance on People v Bewersdorf, 438 Mich 55, 68 ; 475 NW2d 231 (1991), is misplaced because in that case our Supreme Court addressed MCL 257.625 as it existed before its amendment by 1991 PA 98 , which made the existence of prior convictions only part of a…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(7) — 6 cases
People v. Miller, 869 N.W.2d 204 (Mich. 2015). “ANALYSIS AND APPLICATION Subsections (1) through (8) of MCL 257.625 establish different categories of operating while intoxicated offenses.”
People v. Crawford, 467 N.W.2d 818 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991).
People v. Burton, 651 N.W.2d 143 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002).
People v. Haynes, 664 N.W.2d 225 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
People v. Pennebaker, 825 N.W.2d 637 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(7)(a) — 5 cases
People v. Wilcox, 781 N.W.2d 784 (Mich. 2010).
People v. Pennebaker, 825 N.W.2d 637 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(7)(a)(i) — 6 cases
People v. Tavernier, 815 N.W.2d 154 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(7)(a)(ii) — 8 cases
People v. Wolfe, 651 N.W.2d 72 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002).
People v. Pennebaker, 825 N.W.2d 637 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(7)(a)(ii)(B) — 1 case
People v. Pennebaker, 825 N.W.2d 637 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(7)(b) — 4 cases
People v. Poole, 555 N.W.2d 485 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996).
People v. Ward, 594 N.W.2d 47 (Mich. 1999).
People v. Howard, 538 N.W.2d 44 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995).
People v. Ward, 583 N.W.2d 495 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(7)(d) — 13 cases
People v. Miller, 869 N.W.2d 204 (Mich. 2015). “ANALYSIS AND APPLICATION Subsections (1) through (8) of MCL 257.625 establish different categories of operating while intoxicated offenses.”
People v. Reichenbach, 587 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. 1998).
Michigan Educ. Employees Mut. Ins. v. Morris, 596 N.W.2d 142 (Mich. 1999).
People v. Ward, 594 N.W.2d 47 (Mich. 1999).
People v. Edgett, 560 N.W.2d 360 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(7)(e) — 1 case
People v. Asquini, 577 N.W.2d 142 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(7)(g) — 1 case
People v. Burton, 651 N.W.2d 143 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(8) — 46 cases
People v. Feezel, 783 N.W.2d 67 (Mich. 2010). “" [33] It is noteworthy that the Legislature has reenacted MCL 257.625 four times by amending it since this Court decided Derror .”
People v. Koon, 28 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 141 (Mich. 2013).
People v. Derror, 706 N.W.2d 451 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005).
Bloomfield Twp. v. Kane, 839 N.W.2d 505 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “MCL 257.625 addresses offenses involving the operation of a vehicle while under the influence and provides in relevant part: (1) A person, whether licensed or not, shall not operate a vehicle upon a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to…”
People of Michigan v. Dana Lynn Cook, 918 N.W.2d 536 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(8)(a) — 1 case
People v. Hamilton, 638 N.W.2d 92 (Mich. 2002).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(8)(b) — 1 case
People v. Anstey, 719 N.W.2d 579 (Mich. 2006). “Defendant herein was arrested for operating a vehicle while intoxicated, a violation of MCL 257.625. At the arresting officer's request, defendant agreed to take a chemical breath test.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(8)(c) — 6 cases
People v. Callon, 662 N.W.2d 501 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “First, defendant’s reliance on People v Bewersdorf, 438 Mich 55, 68 ; 475 NW2d 231 (1991), is misplaced because in that case our Supreme Court addressed MCL 257.625 as it existed before its amendment by 1991 PA 98 , which made the existence of prior convictions only part of a…”
People v. Burton, 651 N.W.2d 143 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002).
People v. Roseberry, 641 N.W.2d 558 (Mich. 2002).
People v. Clement, 657 N.W.2d 172 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
People v. Hendrix, 688 N.W.2d 838 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(8)(c)(i) — 1 case
People v. Hendrix, 688 N.W.2d 838 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(8)(c)(ii) — 1 case
People v. Hendrix, 688 N.W.2d 838 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(9) — 16 cases
People v. Sadows, 768 N.W.2d 93 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “Because MCL 257.625, as amended by 2006 PA 564 , does not violate the prohibition against ex post facto laws, and because it does not deny defendants their rights to equal protection and due process, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.”
People v. Allen, 884 N.W.2d 548 (Mich. 2016).
People v. Bewersdorf, 475 N.W.2d 231 (Mich. 1991). “[17] Our grant order limited the issues to (1) whether a third or subsequent conviction for violating MCL 257.625; MSA 9.2325 may serve as the current felony for purposes of a second-felony habitual offender charge, (2) whether a third or subsequent conviction for violating MCL…”
People v. Hall, 491 N.W.2d 854 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992).
People v. Tabar, 347 N.W.2d 458 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(9)(a) — 6 cases
People v. Allen, 884 N.W.2d 548 (Mich. 2016).
City of Plymouth v. McIntosh, 804 N.W.2d 859 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(9)(a)(ii) — 4 cases
People v. Stephen, 685 N.W.2d 309 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004).
People v. Stephen, 685 N.W.2d 309 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004).
People of Michigan v. Janelle Vaness (Mich. Ct. App. 2024).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(9)(b) — 2 cases
People v. Anstey, 719 N.W.2d 579 (Mich. 2006). “Defendant herein was arrested for operating a vehicle while intoxicated, a violation of MCL 257.625. At the arresting officer's request, defendant agreed to take a chemical breath test.”
Johnson v. Sec'y of State, 568 N.W.2d 373 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(9)(b)(i) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(9)(c) — 82 cases
People v. Allen, 884 N.W.2d 548 (Mich. 2016).
People v. Butler, 892 N.W.2d 6 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016).
In re Morrow, 854 N.W.2d 89 (Mich. 2014).
People v. Perkins, 760 N.W.2d 669 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(9)(c)(i) — 7 cases
People of Michigan v. Braden Lee Reid (Mich. Ct. App. 2021).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(9)(c)(ii) — 2 cases
in Re Hon Bruce U Morrow (Mich. 2014).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(a) — 5 cases
People v. Keen, 242 N.W.2d 405 (Mich. 1976).
People v. Keen, 223 N.W.2d 700 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974).
Hall v. Sec'y of State, 231 N.W.2d 396 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975).
City of Muskegon v. Cnty. of Muskegon, 233 N.W.2d 849 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(a)(1) — 2 cases
People v. Keen, 223 N.W.2d 700 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(a)(5) — 1 case
Broadwell v. Sec'y of State, 405 N.W.2d 120 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(a)(6)(b) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(a)(7) — 1 case
People v. Burhans, 421 N.W.2d 285 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(a)(ii) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(b) — 4 cases
People v. Pomeroy, 276 N.W.2d 904 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979).
People v. Keen, 223 N.W.2d 700 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974).
People v. Masonis, 228 N.W.2d 489 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975).
Green v. Dearborn Mun. Court, 188 N.W.2d 98 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(b)(3) — 1 case
People v. Underwood, 396 N.W.2d 443 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(c) — 6 cases
Worth v. Dortman, 288 N.W.2d 603 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979).
People v. Harold Johnson, 293 N.W.2d 664 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980).
People v. Pipkin, 287 N.W.2d 352 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979).
Broadwell v. Sec'y of State, 405 N.W.2d 120 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987).
McNitt v. Citco Drilling Co., 230 N.W.2d 318 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(d) — 1 case
People v. Dunn, 304 N.W.2d 856 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(f) — 2 cases
Harbison v. Sec'y of State, 383 N.W.2d 123 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985).
People v. Dunn, 304 N.W.2d 856 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(f)(2) — 1 case
Walters v. Sec'y of State, 403 N.W.2d 552 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(f)(2)(d) — 1 case
William D. McMaster v. City of Troy, 911 F.2d 733 (6th Cir. 1990).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(h) — 1 case
Walters v. Sec'y of State, 403 N.W.2d 552 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(l)(a) — 12 cases
People v. Anstey, 719 N.W.2d 579 (Mich. 2006). “Defendant herein was arrested for operating a vehicle while intoxicated, a violation of MCL 257.625. At the arresting officer's request, defendant agreed to take a chemical breath test.”
Bloomfield Twp. v. Kane, 839 N.W.2d 505 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “MCL 257.625 addresses offenses involving the operation of a vehicle while under the influence and provides in relevant part: (1) A person, whether licensed or not, shall not operate a vehicle upon a highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to…”
People v. Green, 677 N.W.2d 363 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004).
People v. Lardie, 551 N.W.2d 656 (Mich. 1996). “§ 257.625; M.S.A. § 9.2325. Rules of statutory construction dictate that this fourth subsection be construed as consistently as possible with the other subsections of M.”
People v. Lyon, 577 N.W.2d 124 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(l)(b) — 10 cases
People v. Greenfield, 722 N.W.2d 254 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006).
People v. Koon, 28 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 141 (Mich. 2013).
Amerisure Ins. v. Plumb, 766 N.W.2d 878 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009).
People v. Fosnaugh, 639 N.W.2d 587 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002).
People v. Lechleitner, 804 N.W.2d 345 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(l)(c) — 1 case
People of Michigan v. Marcus McCann, 887 N.W.2d 440 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(ll)(a) — 1 case
People v. Haynes, 664 N.W.2d 225 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.625(ll)(b) — 1 case
People v. Haynes, 664 N.W.2d 225 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.