Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 760.1 (2026)

Code of criminal procedure; short title.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE


Act 175 of 1927


760.1 Code of criminal procedure; short title.

Sec. 1.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as "The Code of Criminal Procedure".

History: 1927, Act 175, Eff. Sept. 5, 1927 ;-- Am. 1929, Act 47, Eff. Aug. 28, 1929 ;-- CL 1929, 17116 ;-- CL 1948, 760.1

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 57 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1951–2024 · leading case: People v. Watkins; People v. Pullen, 818 N.W.2d 296 (Mich. 2012).
People v. Watkins; People v. Pullen, 818 N.W.2d 296 (Mich. 2012). · cites it 2× “the practice and procedure in all courts of this state.”24 The Washington Supreme Court very recently reached a similar conclusion and invalidated its state’s similarly worded statute permitting the admission of propensity evidence in sexual abuse cases.”
People v. Smith, 378 N.W.2d 384 (Mich. 1985). · cites it 4× “" Preamble, MCL 760.1 et seq.; MSA 28.841 *439 et seq.”
People v. Jones, 894 N.W.2d 723 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “Similarly, the Michigan Code of Criminal Procedure, MCL 760.1 et seq., states: “ ‘Person’, ‘accused’, or a similar word means an individual or, unless a contrary intention appears, a public or private corporation, partnership, or unincorporated or voluntary association.”
Jones v. Dep't of Corr., 664 N.W.2d 717 (Mich. 2003). · cites it 2× “175 of the Public Acts of 1927, being sections 760.1 to 776.21 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, or to pay an assessment ordered under section 5 of Act No.”
People v. Allen, 884 N.W.2d 548 (Mich. 2016). · cites it 2× “24 It contains three sections to enhance sentences imposed on recidivist offenders. MCL 769.10 applies to those sentenced for their second felony convictions, MCL 769.”
People of Michigan v. Robert Deshawn Lewis, 926 N.W.2d 796 (Mich. 2018). “1k(1)(b)( iv ) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, MCL 760.1 et seq ., without first making findings of fact in support of that amount.”
People of Michigan v. Romon Berry McBurrows, 913 N.W.2d 342 (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “; or the Code of Criminal Procedure, MCL 760.1 et seq. Turning to a dictionary, a "poison" is "[a]ny substance, either taken internally or applied externally, that is injurious to health or dangerous to life.”
People v. Daniel, 523 N.W.2d 830 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994). “, as misdemeanors punishable by up to two years in prison may be considered "felonies” for the purposes of the habitual offender, 1 probation, 2 and consecutive sentencing 3 provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, MCL 760.1 et seq.; MSA 28.841 et seq. See also People v…”
People v. Milton, 224 N.W.2d 266 (Mich. 1974). · cites it 2× “5 MCLA 760.1 etseq.; MSA 28.841 et seq. 6 The opening clauses of the Code of Criminal Procedure read: "AN ACT to revise, consolidate and codify the laws relating to criminal procedure and to define the jurisdiction, powers, and duties of courts and of the judges and other…”
People v. Stevens, 276 N.W.2d 910 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “When the Code of Criminal Procedure, supra, was enacted in 1927, it provided for an alternative method to determine whether a defendant had been previously convicted of a felony, see MCL 769.”
People of Michigan v. Tarone Devon Washington, 916 N.W.2d 477 (Mich. 2018). “9 ("When the performance of any act is prohibited by this or any other statute, and no penalty for the violation of such statute is imposed, either in the same section containing such prohibition, or in any other section or statute, the doing of such act shall be deemed a…”
Lewandowski v. Nuclear Mgmt. Co., LLC, 724 N.W.2d 718 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006). “15d (enumerating the power of a federal law enforcement officer to enforce state law) are both contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, MCL 760.1 et seq., indicating that “law enforcement” refers to the prevention of criminal activities rather than the regulation of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.