Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.675c (2026)

Stopping, standing, or parking violations; registered owner as person prima facie responsible for violation; affirmative defense; civil action; written indemnification agreement; applicability of subsection (3) to leased vehicle; issuing citation to operator.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE


Act 300 of 1949


257.675c Stopping, standing, or parking violations; registered owner as person prima facie responsible for violation; affirmative defense; civil action; written indemnification agreement; applicability of subsection (3) to leased vehicle; issuing citation to operator.

Sec. 675c.

    (1) Except as provided in section 675b or 675e, if a vehicle is stopped, standing, or parked in violation of section 672, 674, 674a, 675, or 676, or other state statute, or a local ordinance prohibiting or restricting the stopping, standing, or parking of a vehicle and the violation is a civil infraction, the person in whose name that vehicle is registered in this state or another state at the time of the violation is prima facie responsible for that violation and subject to section 907.

    (2) The owner of a vehicle cited for a stopping, standing, or parking violation under subsection (1) may assert as an affirmative defense that the vehicle, at the time of the violation, was in the possession of an individual who the owner had not knowingly permitted to operate the vehicle.

    (3) The registered owner of a vehicle who is found to be responsible for a civil infraction as the result of subsection (1) or a leased vehicle owner as that term is defined in section 675b that is found to be responsible for a civil infraction described in section 675b has the right to recover damages in a civil action against the person who parked or stopped the vehicle, or who left the vehicle standing, including, but not limited to, the amount of any civil fine or costs, or both, imposed under section 907. The registered owner of a vehicle or the leased vehicle owner may provide in a written agreement that the person who parked or stopped the vehicle, or who left the vehicle standing, in violation of a state statute or local ordinance, when the violation is a civil infraction, shall indemnify the registered owner or the leased vehicle owner for the damages incurred, including, but not limited to, any civil fine and costs imposed on the registered owner for that civil infraction. This subsection does not apply to a leased vehicle if the court or parking violations bureau issuing the violation finds that the lessee or renter of the vehicle is not responsible for the violation and it is determined that the lessee or renter did not violate the terms of the rental contract or lease agreement.

    (4) A police officer who issues a citation for a vehicle that is stopped, standing, or parked in violation of a state statute or a local ordinance that prohibits or restricts the stopping, standing, or parking of a vehicle may issue the citation for the violation to the operator of the vehicle if the operator is present at the time of the violation.

    

    

History: Add. 1980, Act 518, Eff. Mar. 31, 1981 ;-- Am. 2000, Act 268, Eff. Oct. 1, 2000 ;-- Am. 2024, Act 225, Eff. Oct. 17, 2025

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2003–2012 · leading case: In re Justin, 809 N.W.2d 126 (Mich. 2012).
In re Justin, 809 N.W.2d 126 (Mich. 2012). · cites it 2× “Under Michigan law, the owner of the vehicle “is prima facie responsible” for civil parking infractions, MCL 257.675c(1), and may only assert an “affirmative defense” if the vehicle was “in the possession of a person whom the owner had not knowingly permitted to operate the…”
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. City of Detroit, 658 N.W.2d 180 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 3× “Defendant argued that, instead, the matter was governed by MCL 257.675c and that defendant was entitled to summary disposition under MCR 2.”
Reed v. Breton, 691 N.W.2d 779 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005). “15 *372 For example, the presumption pursuant to MCL 257.675c(l) that the registrant of an illegally parked vehicle is the person responsible for the violation may be rebutted by “competing evidence” of another’s liability.”
in Re Hon James M Justin (Mich. 2012). · cites it 3× “Under Michigan law, the owner of the vehicle “is prima facie responsible” for civil parking infractions, MCL 257.675c(1), and may only assert an “affirmative defense” if the vehicle was “in the possession of a person whom the owner 20 entire judicial process was consciously…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.675c(1) — 2 cases
In re Justin, 809 N.W.2d 126 (Mich. 2012). “Under Michigan law, the owner of the vehicle “is prima facie responsible” for civil parking infractions, MCL 257.675c(1), and may only assert an “affirmative defense” if the vehicle was “in the possession of a person whom the owner had not knowingly permitted to operate the…”
in Re Hon James M Justin (Mich. 2012). “Under Michigan law, the owner of the vehicle “is prima facie responsible” for civil parking infractions, MCL 257.675c(1), and may only assert an “affirmative defense” if the vehicle was “in the possession of a person whom the owner 20 entire judicial process was consciously…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.675c(2) — 1 case
in Re Hon James M Justin (Mich. 2012). “Under Michigan law, the owner of the vehicle “is prima facie responsible” for civil parking infractions, MCL 257.675c(1), and may only assert an “affirmative defense” if the vehicle was “in the possession of a person whom the owner 20 entire judicial process was consciously…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.675c(l) — 1 case
Reed v. Breton, 691 N.W.2d 779 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005). “15 *372 For example, the presumption pursuant to MCL 257.675c(l) that the registrant of an illegally parked vehicle is the person responsible for the violation may be rebutted by “competing evidence” of another’s liability.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.