Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.732a

Fire protection fund; creation; disposition of funds; transmission of fees to state treasurer.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE


Act 300 of 1949


257.732a Fire protection fund; creation; disposition of funds; transmission of fees to state treasurer.

Sec. 732a.

    (1) The fire protection fund is created within the state treasury. The state treasurer may receive money or other assets from any source for deposit into the fund. The state treasurer shall direct the investment of the fund. The state treasurer shall credit to the fund interest and earnings from fund investments. Money in the fund at the close of the fiscal year must remain in the fund and must not lapse to the general fund. The department of licensing and regulatory affairs shall expend money from the fund, upon appropriation, only for fire protection grants to cities, villages, and townships with state-owned facilities for fire services, as provided in 1977 PA 289, MCL 141.951 to 141.956.

    (2) The secretary of state shall transmit the fees collected under this section to the state treasurer. The state treasurer shall credit fee money received under this section in each fiscal year as follows:

    (a) The first $8,500,000.00 must be credited to the fire protection fund created in subsection (1).

    (b) For fiscal year 2017 and for each fiscal year thereafter, after the amount specified in subdivision (a) is credited to the fire protection fund created under subsection (1), the next $1,000,000.00 must be credited to the department of state for necessary expenses incurred by the department of state in implementing and administering the requirements of sections 625k and 625q. Funds appropriated under this subdivision must be based upon an established cost allocation methodology that reflects the actual costs incurred or to be incurred by the secretary of state during the fiscal year. However, except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, funds appropriated under this subdivision must not exceed $1,000,000.00 during any fiscal year.

    (c) Any amount collected after crediting the amounts under subdivisions (a) and (b) must be credited to the general fund.

    (3) It is the intent of the legislature that beginning with the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018, and each fiscal year after that, $8,500,000.00 must be appropriated to the fire protection fund created under subsection (2).

    

    

History: Add. 2003, Act 165, Eff. Oct. 1, 2003 ;-- Am. 2004, Act 52, Eff. May 1, 2004 ;-- Am. 2008, Act 460, Eff. Apr. 1, 2009 ;-- Am. 2008, Act 463, Eff. Oct. 31, 2010 ;-- Am. 2010, Act 155, Eff. Jan. 1, 2011 ;-- Am. 2011, Act 255, Eff. Oct. 1, 2012 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 203, Imd. Eff. June 27, 2012 ;-- Am. 2014, Act 250, Eff. Sept. 23, 2014 ;-- Am. 2016, Act 32, Eff. June 6, 2016 ;-- Am. 2018, Act 43, Imd. Eff. Mar. 1, 2018 ;-- Am. 2018, Act 45, Imd. Eff. Mar. 1, 2018 ;-- Am. 2018, Act 46, Imd. Eff. Mar. 1, 2018 ;-- Am. 2018, Act 50, Eff. Mar. 31, 2018 ;-- Am. 2024, Act 113, Eff. Apr. 2, 2025

Compiler's Notes:

    Enacting section 1 of Act 32 of 2016 provides:

    "Enacting section 1. R 257.1005 and R 257.1006 of the Michigan Administrative Code are rescinded."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2007–2015 · leading case: Dawson v. Secretary of State
Dawson v. Secretary of State (2007) michctapp · cites it 75× “On appeal, plaintiffs seek to have the matter remanded for a class certification of all persons assessed fees under subsections 2(a) and (b) of the driver responsibility law, MCL 257.732a, arguing that the provisions violate the double jeopardy and equal protection clauses of…”
People v. Nunley (2012) mich “321a(2) and MCL 257.732a. These types of violations alone cause the DOS to generate approximately 800,000 combined notices and certificates of mailing a year.”
People v. Juntikka (2015) michctapp · cites it 2× “, MCL 257.732a (providing that individuals must pay a specific driver responsibility fee upon accumulating seven or more points on a driving record within a 2-year period); MCL 117.”
In re Justin (2012) mich “The master noted that Wilson pleaded guilty to 10 *401 counts of driving without a license, but respondent waived all the fines and costs and stopped all 10 abstracts from being sent to the Secretary of State, resulting in Wilson’s avoiding the fees required by MCL 257.732a. The…”
in Re Hon James M Justin (2012) mich “The master noted that Wilson pleaded guilty to 10 counts of driving without a license, but respondent waived all the fines and costs and stopped all 10 abstracts from being sent to the Secretary of State, resulting in Wilson’s avoiding the fees required by MCL 257.732a. The…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.732a(1) — 2 cases
Dawson v. Secretary of State (2007) michctapp “On appeal, plaintiffs seek to have the matter remanded for a class certification of all persons assessed fees under subsections 2(a) and (b) of the driver responsibility law, MCL 257.732a, arguing that the provisions violate the double jeopardy and equal protection clauses of…”
People v. Juntikka (2015) michctapp “, MCL 257.732a (providing that individuals must pay a specific driver responsibility fee upon accumulating seven or more points on a driving record within a 2-year period); MCL 117.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.732a(10) — 1 case
Dawson v. Secretary of State (2007) michctapp “On appeal, plaintiffs seek to have the matter remanded for a class certification of all persons assessed fees under subsections 2(a) and (b) of the driver responsibility law, MCL 257.732a, arguing that the provisions violate the double jeopardy and equal protection clauses of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.732a(2) — 1 case
Dawson v. Secretary of State (2007) michctapp “On appeal, plaintiffs seek to have the matter remanded for a class certification of all persons assessed fees under subsections 2(a) and (b) of the driver responsibility law, MCL 257.732a, arguing that the provisions violate the double jeopardy and equal protection clauses of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.732a(2)(a) — 1 case
Dawson v. Secretary of State (2007) michctapp “On appeal, plaintiffs seek to have the matter remanded for a class certification of all persons assessed fees under subsections 2(a) and (b) of the driver responsibility law, MCL 257.732a, arguing that the provisions violate the double jeopardy and equal protection clauses of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.732a(2)(a)(i) — 1 case
Dawson v. Secretary of State (2007) michctapp “On appeal, plaintiffs seek to have the matter remanded for a class certification of all persons assessed fees under subsections 2(a) and (b) of the driver responsibility law, MCL 257.732a, arguing that the provisions violate the double jeopardy and equal protection clauses of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.732a(2)(b) — 1 case
Dawson v. Secretary of State (2007) michctapp “On appeal, plaintiffs seek to have the matter remanded for a class certification of all persons assessed fees under subsections 2(a) and (b) of the driver responsibility law, MCL 257.732a, arguing that the provisions violate the double jeopardy and equal protection clauses of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.732a(2)(b)(i) — 1 case
Dawson v. Secretary of State (2007) michctapp “On appeal, plaintiffs seek to have the matter remanded for a class certification of all persons assessed fees under subsections 2(a) and (b) of the driver responsibility law, MCL 257.732a, arguing that the provisions violate the double jeopardy and equal protection clauses of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.732a(2)(c) — 1 case
Dawson v. Secretary of State (2007) michctapp “On appeal, plaintiffs seek to have the matter remanded for a class certification of all persons assessed fees under subsections 2(a) and (b) of the driver responsibility law, MCL 257.732a, arguing that the provisions violate the double jeopardy and equal protection clauses of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.732a(3) — 1 case
Dawson v. Secretary of State (2007) michctapp “On appeal, plaintiffs seek to have the matter remanded for a class certification of all persons assessed fees under subsections 2(a) and (b) of the driver responsibility law, MCL 257.732a, arguing that the provisions violate the double jeopardy and equal protection clauses of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.732a(5) — 1 case
Dawson v. Secretary of State (2007) michctapp “On appeal, plaintiffs seek to have the matter remanded for a class certification of all persons assessed fees under subsections 2(a) and (b) of the driver responsibility law, MCL 257.732a, arguing that the provisions violate the double jeopardy and equal protection clauses of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.732a(9) — 1 case
Dawson v. Secretary of State (2007) michctapp “On appeal, plaintiffs seek to have the matter remanded for a class certification of all persons assessed fees under subsections 2(a) and (b) of the driver responsibility law, MCL 257.732a, arguing that the provisions violate the double jeopardy and equal protection clauses of…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.732a(l) — 1 case
Dawson v. Secretary of State (2007) michctapp “On appeal, plaintiffs seek to have the matter remanded for a class certification of all persons assessed fees under subsections 2(a) and (b) of the driver responsibility law, MCL 257.732a, arguing that the provisions violate the double jeopardy and equal protection clauses of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.