Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 28 / Act 59 of 1935
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.1 (2026)

Michigan state police; definitions.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN STATE POLICE


Act 59 of 1935


28.1 Michigan state police; definitions.

Sec. 1.

    As employed in this act, the following words or terms shall be understood to mean:

    (a) The word "commissioner" shall mean commissioner or commanding officer of the Michigan state police.

    (b) "Acting commissioner" shall mean the acting commissioner or commanding officer of the Michigan state police.

    (c) "Officer" shall mean any member of the Michigan state police executing the constitutional oath of office.

    (d) "Civilian employe" shall mean any employe not executing the constitutional oath of office.

    (e) "Members,""members of the department," or "members of said department" shall mean any employe of said department whether an officer or a civilian employe.

    (f) "Department" shall mean the "Michigan state police."

History: 1935, Act 59, Imd. Eff. May 17, 1935 ;-- CL 1948, 28.1

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1961–1999 · leading case: Kivela v. Dep't of Treasury, 536 N.W.2d 498 (Mich. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kivela v. Dep't of Treasury, 536 N.W.2d 498 (Mich. 1995). · cites it 2× “See MCL 28.1 et seq.; MSA 4.431 et seq. [24] Wolf also directs us to consider whether there is a statutory scheme in which both agencies share common resources.”
Manzoni v. Detroit Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 109 N.W.2d 918 (Mich. 1961). “2 Harper and James, Torts, § 28.1, at 1535. See, also, Professor (now Mr.”
Capital Region Airport Auth. v. DeWitt Charter Twp., 601 N.W.2d 141 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “9 MCL 28.1 et seq.) MSA 4.431 et seq. 10 MCL 324.”
Addison Twp. v. Dep't of State Police, 560 N.W.2d 67 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). “Thus, we turn to the Michigan State Police act, MCL 28.1 et seq.; MSA 4.431 et seq., to determine if the Legislature intended to grant immunity to the state police from the provisions of the local zoning ordinance.”
Michigan State Employees Ass'n v. Attorney Gen., 496 N.W.2d 370 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992). “, and peace officers under the Michigan State Police Act, MCL 28.1 et seq.; MSA 4.431 et seq. Plaintiffs and defendants filed motions for summary disposition.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.